<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Privacy in a Public Place</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cearta.ie/2007/01/privacy-in-a-public-place/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/01/privacy-in-a-public-place/</link>
	<description>the Irish for rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:43:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Privates on parade: privacy in public (again)</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/01/privacy-in-a-public-place/comment-page-1/#comment-17435</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Privates on parade: privacy in public (again)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=54#comment-17435</guid>
		<description>[...] In Sinnott v Carlow Nationalist (already discussed on this blog here, here, here, here, here, and here), the Circuit Court and the High Court held that the publication by the Carlow [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In Sinnott v Carlow Nationalist (already discussed on this blog here, here, here, here, here, and here), the Circuit Court and the High Court held that the publication by the Carlow [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Quick question for privacy lawyers</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/01/privacy-in-a-public-place/comment-page-1/#comment-5188</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Quick question for privacy lawyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=54#comment-5188</guid>
		<description>[...] at Ski Resort) be actionable having regard to Sinnott v Carlow Nationalist (discussed here, here, here, here and here), and if so, should they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Ski Resort) be actionable having regard to Sinnott v Carlow Nationalist (discussed here, here, here, here and here), and if so, should they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Privacy in a private place: nude people have rights too</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/01/privacy-in-a-public-place/comment-page-1/#comment-5079</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Privacy in a private place: nude people have rights too</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=54#comment-5079</guid>
		<description>[...] Nationalist (High Court, unreported, 30 July 2008, Budd J) (already discussed on this site: here, here, here and here), Budd J held that the publication of a photograph of the plaintiff playing Gaelic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nationalist (High Court, unreported, 30 July 2008, Budd J) (already discussed on this site: here, here, here and here), Budd J held that the publication of a photograph of the plaintiff playing Gaelic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie Â» Privacy 3 - 0 Press</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/01/privacy-in-a-public-place/comment-page-1/#comment-3951</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie Â» Privacy 3 - 0 Press</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=54#comment-3951</guid>
		<description>[...] in the third case (earlier aspects of which have already featured on this blog, here, here and here), Sinnott v Carlow Nationalist (High Court, unreported, 30 July 2008, Budd J) (see [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the third case (earlier aspects of which have already featured on this blog, here, here and here), Sinnott v Carlow Nationalist (High Court, unreported, 30 July 2008, Budd J) (see [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eoin</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/01/privacy-in-a-public-place/comment-page-1/#comment-3342</link>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 21:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=54#comment-3342</guid>
		<description>Before &lt;i&gt;Sinnott&lt;/i&gt;, the leading case on privacy in a public place as a matter of Irish law was &lt;i&gt;Atherton v DPP&lt;/i&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IEHC/2005/H429.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;[2005] IEHC 429&lt;/a&gt; (21 December 2005), incisively analysed by Eoin Carolan in &quot;Stars of Citizen CCTV: Video Surveillance and the Right to Privacy in Public Places&quot; (2006) 28 &lt;i&gt;DULJ&lt;/i&gt; (&lt;i&gt;ns&lt;/i&gt;) 326.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before <i>Sinnott</i>, the leading case on privacy in a public place as a matter of Irish law was <i>Atherton v DPP</i> <a href="http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IEHC/2005/H429.html" rel="nofollow">[2005] IEHC 429</a> (21 December 2005), incisively analysed by Eoin Carolan in &#8220;Stars of Citizen CCTV: Video Surveillance and the Right to Privacy in Public Places&#8221; (2006) 28 <i>DULJ</i> (<i>ns</i>) 326.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

