http://www.cearta.ie/2007/02/new-bills/ the Irish for rights Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:43:36 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://www.cearta.ie/2007/02/new-bills/comment-page-1/#comment-10532 cearta.ie » Revising the statute book is dusty but serious business Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:07:54 +0000 http://www.cearta.ie/?p=80#comment-10532 [...] to my three posts on the Statute Law Revision Act, 2007 (also here), I note that the second stage of the [...] [...] to my three posts on the Statute Law Revision Act, 2007 (also here), I note that the second stage of the [...]

]]> http://www.cearta.ie/2007/02/new-bills/comment-page-1/#comment-3688 cearta.ie » So farewell then, Norman French (again) Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:40:41 +0000 http://www.cearta.ie/?p=80#comment-3688 [...] have blogged already (here and here) about the Statute Law Revision Act, 2007. If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, then the [...] [...] have blogged already (here and here) about the Statute Law Revision Act, 2007. If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, then the [...]

]]> http://www.cearta.ie/2007/02/new-bills/comment-page-1/#comment-1488 cearta.ie » Blog Archive » Consumers’ Days Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:16:37 +0000 http://www.cearta.ie/?p=80#comment-1488 [...] the European Consumers’ Organisation (BEUC)), and the Consumer Protection Bill, 2007 (noted here) wends its way through Committee stage in the Dáil (just in time for enactment before the general [...] [...] the European Consumers’ Organisation (BEUC)), and the Consumer Protection Bill, 2007 (noted here) wends its way through Committee stage in the Dáil (just in time for enactment before the general [...]

]]> http://www.cearta.ie/2007/02/new-bills/comment-page-1/#comment-57 Lex Ferenda » Dot IE and the Communications Regulation (Amendment) Bill Thu, 08 Feb 2007 19:57:06 +0000 http://www.cearta.ie/?p=80#comment-57 [...] did comment on Eoin’s post, saying that the difference was that “what has emerged in this bill is a more detailed set of [...] [...] did comment on Eoin’s post, saying that the difference was that “what has emerged in this bill is a more detailed set of [...]

]]> http://www.cearta.ie/2007/02/new-bills/comment-page-1/#comment-43 Daithí Sat, 03 Feb 2007 22:34:58 +0000 http://www.cearta.ie/?p=80#comment-43 Indeed. It's interesting that the responses to the Department's consultation weren't published (as far as I can see); normal practice is to stick these on the website as a matter of course (although I do remember noting at the time that circulating the heads so openly was relatively uncommon). However, for now I think the clear conclusion that can be drawn from the detailed language that emerged is that DCMNR is anxious to see that something happens; what that something is is less clear. Indeed. It’s interesting that the responses to the Department’s consultation weren’t published (as far as I can see); normal practice is to stick these on the website as a matter of course (although I do remember noting at the time that circulating the heads so openly was relatively uncommon). However, for now I think the clear conclusion that can be drawn from the detailed language that emerged is that DCMNR is anxious to see that something happens; what that something is is less clear.

]]>