<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sinnott v Carlow Nationalist for the Supreme Court?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cearta.ie/2007/02/sinnott-v-carlow-nationalist-for-the-supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/02/sinnott-v-carlow-nationalist-for-the-supreme-court/</link>
	<description>the Irish for rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:43:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » You don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;ve lost till it&#8217;s gone? Privacy in a world gone Web2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/02/sinnott-v-carlow-nationalist-for-the-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-6932</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » You don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;ve lost till it&#8217;s gone? Privacy in a world gone Web2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=77#comment-6932</guid>
		<description>[...] footage if she collapses off her boyfriend&#8217;s shoulder with a heart-attack? Recall the controversy when a football player&#8217;s shorts revealed more than they should have done in a photograph in a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] footage if she collapses off her boyfriend&#8217;s shoulder with a heart-attack? Recall the controversy when a football player&#8217;s shorts revealed more than they should have done in a photograph in a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Quick question for privacy lawyers</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/02/sinnott-v-carlow-nationalist-for-the-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-5190</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Quick question for privacy lawyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=77#comment-5190</guid>
		<description>[...] be actionable having regard to Sinnott v Carlow Nationalist (discussed here, here, here, here and here), and if so, should they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be actionable having regard to Sinnott v Carlow Nationalist (discussed here, here, here, here and here), and if so, should they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Privacy in a private place: nude people have rights too</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/02/sinnott-v-carlow-nationalist-for-the-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-5104</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Privacy in a private place: nude people have rights too</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 09:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=77#comment-5104</guid>
		<description>[...] Court, unreported, 30 July 2008, Budd J) (already discussed on this site: here, here, here and here), Budd J held that the publication of a photograph of the plaintiff playing Gaelic football in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Court, unreported, 30 July 2008, Budd J) (already discussed on this site: here, here, here and here), Budd J held that the publication of a photograph of the plaintiff playing Gaelic football in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie Â» Privacy 3 - 0 Press</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/02/sinnott-v-carlow-nationalist-for-the-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-3952</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie Â» Privacy 3 - 0 Press</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=77#comment-3952</guid>
		<description>[...] in the third case (earlier aspects of which have already featured on this blog, here, here and here), Sinnott v Carlow Nationalist (High Court, unreported, 30 July 2008, Budd J) (see The Irish [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the third case (earlier aspects of which have already featured on this blog, here, here and here), Sinnott v Carlow Nationalist (High Court, unreported, 30 July 2008, Budd J) (see The Irish [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Privacy law in the UK</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/02/sinnott-v-carlow-nationalist-for-the-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Privacy law in the UK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 22:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=77#comment-58</guid>
		<description>[...] recently argued here that, if the High Court in Sinnott v Carlow Nationalist refers the matter to the Supreme Court, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently argued here that, if the High Court in Sinnott v Carlow Nationalist refers the matter to the Supreme Court, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

