<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What price privacy when cctv is about?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cearta.ie/2007/04/what-price-privacy-when-cctv-is-about/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/04/what-price-privacy-when-cctv-is-about/</link>
	<description>the Irish for rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:43:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » You don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;ve lost till it&#8217;s gone? Privacy in a world gone Web2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/04/what-price-privacy-when-cctv-is-about/comment-page-1/#comment-6931</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » You don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;ve lost till it&#8217;s gone? Privacy in a world gone Web2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/2007/04/what-price-privacy-when-cctv-is-about/#comment-6931</guid>
		<description>[...] about a world where our privacy is invaded - not so much by state surveillance or corporate cctv, which we all now recognise, tolerate, even accept (so the helmet cams are little more than [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about a world where our privacy is invaded &#8211; not so much by state surveillance or corporate cctv, which we all now recognise, tolerate, even accept (so the helmet cams are little more than [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eoin</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/04/what-price-privacy-when-cctv-is-about/comment-page-1/#comment-3430</link>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 20:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/2007/04/what-price-privacy-when-cctv-is-about/#comment-3430</guid>
		<description>The Department approved over â‚¬225,000 in grant funding for community CCTV in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.justice.ie/en/JELR/Pages/PR07000661&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;May&lt;/a&gt;; whilst the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.justice.ie/en/JELR/Pages/Minister%20Lenihan%20announces%20over%20%E2%82%AC2.75m%20in%20Community%20CCTV%20funding&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;most recent stage&lt;/a&gt; of the Department&#039;s policy (the Minister&#039;s speech is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.justice.ie/en/JELR/Pages/Address%20by%20the%20Minister%20for%20Justice,%20Equality%20and%20Law%20Reform%20to%20announce%20the%20successful%20applicants%20for%20grant-aid%20under%20the%20Community-based%20CCTV%20scheme,%20Ballymun%20Civic%20Offices&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;) is discussed on DRI&#039;s blog &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitalrights.ie/2007/07/31/safeguards-needed-for-cctv-systems/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here,&lt;/a&gt; arguing again that safeguards are needed for such cctv systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Department approved over â‚¬225,000 in grant funding for community CCTV in <a href="http://www.justice.ie/en/JELR/Pages/PR07000661" rel="nofollow">May</a>; whilst the <a href="http://www.justice.ie/en/JELR/Pages/Minister%20Lenihan%20announces%20over%20%E2%82%AC2.75m%20in%20Community%20CCTV%20funding" rel="nofollow">most recent stage</a> of the Department&#8217;s policy (the Minister&#8217;s speech is <a href="http://www.justice.ie/en/JELR/Pages/Address%20by%20the%20Minister%20for%20Justice,%20Equality%20and%20Law%20Reform%20to%20announce%20the%20successful%20applicants%20for%20grant-aid%20under%20the%20Community-based%20CCTV%20scheme,%20Ballymun%20Civic%20Offices" rel="nofollow">here</a>) is discussed on DRI&#8217;s blog <a href="http://www.digitalrights.ie/2007/07/31/safeguards-needed-for-cctv-systems/" rel="nofollow">here,</a> arguing again that safeguards are needed for such cctv systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eoin</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/04/what-price-privacy-when-cctv-is-about/comment-page-1/#comment-2849</link>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 07:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/2007/04/what-price-privacy-when-cctv-is-about/#comment-2849</guid>
		<description>For an example of the kinds of possible abuses, against which there need to be protections, see R v Hardy (Attorney Generalâ€™s Reference (No 1 of 2007) (Attorney Generalâ€™s Reference (No 1 of 2007)) (Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, 7 March 2007) reported in &lt;a href=&quot;http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/reports/article1642600.ece&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Times (12 April 2007)&lt;/a&gt; under the law report headnote: 
&lt;blockquote&gt;Police officers had to realise that accessing the police national computer for an improper purpose was an offence that required an immediate prison sentence.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For an example of the kinds of possible abuses, against which there need to be protections, see R v Hardy (Attorney Generalâ€™s Reference (No 1 of 2007) (Attorney Generalâ€™s Reference (No 1 of 2007)) (Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, 7 March 2007) reported in <a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/reports/article1642600.ece" rel="nofollow">The Times (12 April 2007)</a> under the law report headnote: </p>
<blockquote><p>Police officers had to realise that accessing the police national computer for an improper purpose was an offence that required an immediate prison sentence.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

