<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unpalatable &#8211; defamatory restaurant reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cearta.ie/2007/06/unpalatable-defamatory-restaurant-reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/06/unpalatable-defamatory-restaurant-reviews/</link>
	<description>the Irish for rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:53:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Don&#8217;t mention the hotel</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/06/unpalatable-defamatory-restaurant-reviews/comment-page-1/#comment-10846</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Don&#8217;t mention the hotel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/2007/06/unpalatable-defamatory-restaurant-reviews/#comment-10846</guid>
		<description>[...] are in principle capable of being defamatory, they will almost always attract the benefit of the defence of fair comment. In Ireland, section 20(1) of the Defamation Act, 2009 has rebadged fair comment as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are in principle capable of being defamatory, they will almost always attract the benefit of the defence of fair comment. In Ireland, section 20(1) of the Defamation Act, 2009 has rebadged fair comment as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: And they didn&#8217;t leave a tip &#124; Nearly Legal</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/06/unpalatable-defamatory-restaurant-reviews/comment-page-1/#comment-10303</link>
		<dc:creator>And they didn&#8217;t leave a tip &#124; Nearly Legal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/2007/06/unpalatable-defamatory-restaurant-reviews/#comment-10303</guid>
		<description>[...] Thanks to Martin in the comments for pointing out Eoin O&#039;Dell&#039;s post on these cases. Well worth reading.]  &#160;Print This [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thanks to Martin in the comments for pointing out Eoin O&#39;Dell&#39;s post on these cases. Well worth reading.]  &nbsp;Print This [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belfast Maine Accommodations</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/06/unpalatable-defamatory-restaurant-reviews/comment-page-1/#comment-6974</link>
		<dc:creator>Belfast Maine Accommodations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 10:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/2007/06/unpalatable-defamatory-restaurant-reviews/#comment-6974</guid>
		<description>Interesting and informative article. Loved it :) I too always have been a food critic. anyway thanks for the effort. appreciate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting and informative article. Loved it <img src='http://www.cearta.ie/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I too always have been a food critic. anyway thanks for the effort. appreciate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oz high court: restaurant review was defamatory</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/06/unpalatable-defamatory-restaurant-reviews/comment-page-1/#comment-3884</link>
		<dc:creator>Oz high court: restaurant review was defamatory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 04:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/2007/06/unpalatable-defamatory-restaurant-reviews/#comment-3884</guid>
		<description>[...] a substantial links list on this and earlier restaurant-review lawsuits from various countries (Jun. 16). Previously at this site: Mar. 10, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a substantial links list on this and earlier restaurant-review lawsuits from various countries (Jun. 16). Previously at this site: Mar. 10, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie Â» Appeal overturns food review case</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/06/unpalatable-defamatory-restaurant-reviews/comment-page-1/#comment-3653</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie Â» Appeal overturns food review case</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/2007/06/unpalatable-defamatory-restaurant-reviews/#comment-3653</guid>
		<description>[...] libel case, seen as a watershed for press freedom&#8221;. As already discussed on this blog (here, here and here) food critics writing restaurant reviews will usually be able to rely on the defence [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] libel case, seen as a watershed for press freedom&#8221;. As already discussed on this blog (here, here and here) food critics writing restaurant reviews will usually be able to rely on the defence [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
