<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defamation, privilege, and a public interest defence, in the Irish High Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cearta.ie/2007/10/defamation-privilege-and-a-public-interest-defence-in-the-irish-high-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/10/defamation-privilege-and-a-public-interest-defence-in-the-irish-high-court/</link>
	<description>the Irish for rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:47:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » The Defamation Act, 2009 in the courts</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/10/defamation-privilege-and-a-public-interest-defence-in-the-irish-high-court/comment-page-1/#comment-13995</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » The Defamation Act, 2009 in the courts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/2007/10/defamation-privilege-and-a-public-interest-defence-in-the-irish-high-court/#comment-13995</guid>
		<description>[...] to section 20). The defence of fair and reasonable publication is the Irish statutory equivalent of a defence developed by the courts in other jurisdictions to increase the ambit of permissible criticism about politicians and political matters; and there [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to section 20). The defence of fair and reasonable publication is the Irish statutory equivalent of a defence developed by the courts in other jurisdictions to increase the ambit of permissible criticism about politicians and political matters; and there [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » The defence of responsible journalism must await another case</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/10/defamation-privilege-and-a-public-interest-defence-in-the-irish-high-court/comment-page-1/#comment-11993</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » The defence of responsible journalism must await another case</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 22:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/2007/10/defamation-privilege-and-a-public-interest-defence-in-the-irish-high-court/#comment-11993</guid>
		<description>[...] Court ([2003] IEHC 81 (31 July 2003)) seemed to approve of the defence (at least in the view of Charlton J in a later case), but the Supreme Court ducked the question and returned the case to the High Court. However, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Court ([2003] IEHC 81 (31 July 2003)) seemed to approve of the defence (at least in the view of Charlton J in a later case), but the Supreme Court ducked the question and returned the case to the High Court. However, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » The last Irish case on criminal libel</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/10/defamation-privilege-and-a-public-interest-defence-in-the-irish-high-court/comment-page-1/#comment-11518</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » The last Irish case on criminal libel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 06:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/2007/10/defamation-privilege-and-a-public-interest-defence-in-the-irish-high-court/#comment-11518</guid>
		<description>[...] the Convention has been used to recalibrate the common law in the context both of privacy and of libel, and Gilligan J&#8217;s reasoning would seem to undercut this kind of development. It remains to be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Convention has been used to recalibrate the common law in the context both of privacy and of libel, and Gilligan J&#8217;s reasoning would seem to undercut this kind of development. It remains to be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Defamation and the Constitution</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/10/defamation-privilege-and-a-public-interest-defence-in-the-irish-high-court/comment-page-1/#comment-11499</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Defamation and the Constitution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/2007/10/defamation-privilege-and-a-public-interest-defence-in-the-irish-high-court/#comment-11499</guid>
		<description>[...] may have been generated by the Constitution or the Convention, such as the emergent defence of responsible publication in the public interest. Again, section 20(1) provides for a defence of honest opinion, renaming and replacing the defence [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] may have been generated by the Constitution or the Convention, such as the emergent defence of responsible publication in the public interest. Again, section 20(1) provides for a defence of honest opinion, renaming and replacing the defence [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Defamation, opinion, and the presumption of innocence</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2007/10/defamation-privilege-and-a-public-interest-defence-in-the-irish-high-court/comment-page-1/#comment-10864</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Defamation, opinion, and the presumption of innocence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/2007/10/defamation-privilege-and-a-public-interest-defence-in-the-irish-high-court/#comment-10864</guid>
		<description>[...] way of approaching the problems in the case before him. On the issue of qualified privilege, the High Court later came to a similar conclusion in a case in which the issue had properly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] way of approaching the problems in the case before him. On the issue of qualified privilege, the High Court later came to a similar conclusion in a case in which the issue had properly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

