<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Appeal overturns food review case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cearta.ie/2008/03/appeal-overturns-food-review-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2008/03/appeal-overturns-food-review-case/</link>
	<description>the Irish for rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:43:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Simon Singh, &#8216;bogus&#8217; claims, and &#8211; finally &#8211; sense about libel</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2008/03/appeal-overturns-food-review-case/comment-page-1/#comment-12487</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Simon Singh, &#8216;bogus&#8217; claims, and &#8211; finally &#8211; sense about libel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/2008/03/appeal-overturns-food-review-case/#comment-12487</guid>
		<description>[...] 20 Defamation Act, 2009 (also here). It is better to see the refreshingly open approach to the defence of fair comment at common [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 20 Defamation Act, 2009 (also here). It is better to see the refreshingly open approach to the defence of fair comment at common [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Defamation and the Constitution</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2008/03/appeal-overturns-food-review-case/comment-page-1/#comment-11502</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Defamation and the Constitution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/2008/03/appeal-overturns-food-review-case/#comment-11502</guid>
		<description>[...] section 20(1) provides for a defence of honest opinion, renaming and replacing the defence  of fair comment. The plea in Hunter v Duckworth [2003] IEHC 81 (31 July 2003), dodged by the Supreme Court, was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] section 20(1) provides for a defence of honest opinion, renaming and replacing the defence  of fair comment. The plea in Hunter v Duckworth [2003] IEHC 81 (31 July 2003), dodged by the Supreme Court, was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DUI Attorney</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2008/03/appeal-overturns-food-review-case/comment-page-1/#comment-11049</link>
		<dc:creator>DUI Attorney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/2008/03/appeal-overturns-food-review-case/#comment-11049</guid>
		<description>Food critics writing restaurant reviews, as long as they don&#039;t go beyond their boundaries, can be of good help to anybody in a sense that they provide relevant information regarding a certain restaurant where people should go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Food critics writing restaurant reviews, as long as they don&#8217;t go beyond their boundaries, can be of good help to anybody in a sense that they provide relevant information regarding a certain restaurant where people should go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2008/03/appeal-overturns-food-review-case/comment-page-1/#comment-5234</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/2008/03/appeal-overturns-food-review-case/#comment-5234</guid>
		<description>Critics need to be able to say what they think, we listen to them and they must not be affraid to say what they feel is right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Critics need to be able to say what they think, we listen to them and they must not be affraid to say what they feel is right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Kirk</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2008/03/appeal-overturns-food-review-case/comment-page-1/#comment-5140</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/2008/03/appeal-overturns-food-review-case/#comment-5140</guid>
		<description>Another Irish case sparking</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another Irish case sparking</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

