Comments on: Journalists’ Sources – Lessons from Canada?

By: cearta.ie » No Supreme Court judgment yet in journalists’ sources appeal

cearta.ie » No Supreme Court judgment yet in journalists’ sources appeal — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:00:57 +0000

[...] the Supreme Court is determined to make us all virtuous. As we eagerly await their decision in the appeal from the decision of the High Court in Mahon v Keena [2007] IEHC 348 (23 October 2007), it appears [...]

By: cearta.ie » Journalists’ source privilege: one privilege or two?

cearta.ie » Journalists’ source privilege: one privilege or two? — Tue, 05 May 2009 10:24:26 +0000

[...] in Ireland and Canada, cases are pending in both countries’ Supreme Courts on the question of the nature [...]

By: cearta.ie » International instruments on the protection of journalists’ sources

Mon, 04 May 2009 20:47:47 +0000

[...] reasonably good health. Whether that is true of Ireland will be decided by the Supreme Court in its forthcoming decision in the appeal in Mahon v Keena [2007] IEHC 348 (23 October [...]

By: cearta.ie » Covert surveillance, privilege, and iniquity

cearta.ie » Covert surveillance, privilege, and iniquity — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:12:45 +0000

[...] an Irish perspective, we must await the decision of the Supreme Court on the existence (and, if it exists, the extent) of a journalists source [...]

By: Chelsea M Heffner

Chelsea M Heffner — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 23:49:26 +0000

I’m always a supporter of free rights and privacy but when the powerful politicians are involved, you can bet they will do anything to make sure you don’t show the world the truth of their corrupt dealings (if they have any).