http://www.cearta.ie/2009/01/quick-question-for-privacy-lawyers/ the Irish for rights Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:43:36 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://www.cearta.ie/2009/01/quick-question-for-privacy-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-17471 Privates on parade: privacy in public (again) – Eoin O’Dell « Inforrm's Blog Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:05:02 +0000 http://www.cearta.ie/?p=1122#comment-17471 [...] can be even more embarassing. In Sinnott v Carlow Nationalist (already discussed on this blog here, here, here, here, here, and here), the Circuit Court and the High Court held that the publication [...] [...] can be even more embarassing. In Sinnott v Carlow Nationalist (already discussed on this blog here, here, here, here, here, and here), the Circuit Court and the High Court held that the publication [...]

]]> http://www.cearta.ie/2009/01/quick-question-for-privacy-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-17434 cearta.ie » Privates on parade: privacy in public (again) Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:41:26 +0000 http://www.cearta.ie/?p=1122#comment-17434 [...] can be even more embarassing. In Sinnott v Carlow Nationalist (already discussed on this blog here, here, here, here, here, and here), the Circuit Court and the High Court held that the publication [...] [...] can be even more embarassing. In Sinnott v Carlow Nationalist (already discussed on this blog here, here, here, here, here, and here), the Circuit Court and the High Court held that the publication [...]

]]> http://www.cearta.ie/2009/01/quick-question-for-privacy-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-5198 Eoin Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:31:41 +0000 http://www.cearta.ie/?p=1122#comment-5198 I entirely agree that this would be a stronger case than <i>Sinnott</i> if he were identified. But ought this to be a <strong>privacy</strong> claim? I'm still not convinced about that. I entirely agree that this would be a stronger case than Sinnott if he were identified. But ought this to be a privacy claim? I’m still not convinced about that.

]]> http://www.cearta.ie/2009/01/quick-question-for-privacy-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-5135 TJ Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:23:34 +0000 http://www.cearta.ie/?p=1122#comment-5135 Two thoughts. The unfortunate skier doesn't seem to be named or have his face visible in your links and without identification a Sinnott type claim would seem to fail. If he were identifiable then this is if anything a much stronger claim than Sinnott - this individual didn't set out to draw attention to himself by competing in a public arena and any publication of the wardrobe malfunction would be intentional rather than negligent. Two thoughts. The unfortunate skier doesn’t seem to be named or have his face visible in your links and without identification a Sinnott type claim would seem to fail. If he were identifiable then this is if anything a much stronger claim than Sinnott – this individual didn’t set out to draw attention to himself by competing in a public arena and any publication of the wardrobe malfunction would be intentional rather than negligent.

]]>