<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sedition and Lèse-majesté</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cearta.ie/2009/01/sedition-and-lese-majeste/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/01/sedition-and-lese-majeste/</link>
	<description>the Irish for rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:43:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Cowengate: no use crying over spilt milk</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/01/sedition-and-lese-majeste/comment-page-1/#comment-8073</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Cowengate: no use crying over spilt milk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=1346#comment-8073</guid>
		<description>[...] libel, a Thai blogger has been sentenced to ten years imprisonment after pleading guilty under Thailand&#8217;s ugly lèse-majesté laws - his crime was to have posted anti-monarchy pictures and comments on his blog, and two journalists [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] libel, a Thai blogger has been sentenced to ten years imprisonment after pleading guilty under Thailand&#8217;s ugly lèse-majesté laws &#8211; his crime was to have posted anti-monarchy pictures and comments on his blog, and two journalists [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Cowengate and seditious libel</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/01/sedition-and-lese-majeste/comment-page-1/#comment-7905</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Cowengate and seditious libel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 21:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=1346#comment-7905</guid>
		<description>[...] can be asked in this context demonstrates just how ridiculous the crime actually is. It&#8217;s on the way out in Australia. Now, thankfully, its days may now finally be numbered, both in Ireland and in the UK [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can be asked in this context demonstrates just how ridiculous the crime actually is. It&#8217;s on the way out in Australia. Now, thankfully, its days may now finally be numbered, both in Ireland and in the UK [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Why are legislators so loath to repeal criminal libel provisions?</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/01/sedition-and-lese-majeste/comment-page-1/#comment-7606</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Why are legislators so loath to repeal criminal libel provisions?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=1346#comment-7606</guid>
		<description>[...] I have already blogged extensively about a similar Irish effort (here, here, here, here, here and here) in Part 5 of the still-delayed Defamation Bill, 2006. Whatever happened to that? Indeed, as the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have already blogged extensively about a similar Irish effort (here, here, here, here, here and here) in Part 5 of the still-delayed Defamation Bill, 2006. Whatever happened to that? Indeed, as the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

