<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Article 10 and the Duke of Brunswick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/article-10-and-the-duke-of-brunswick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/article-10-and-the-duke-of-brunswick/</link>
	<description>the Irish for rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:53:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Libel tourism, online defamation and multiple publication</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/article-10-and-the-duke-of-brunswick/comment-page-1/#comment-10480</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Libel tourism, online defamation and multiple publication</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=2058#comment-10480</guid>
		<description>[...] multiple publication rule was established in Duke of Brunswick v Harmer (1849) 14 QB 185 (already discussed on this blog), reaffirmed in Loutchansky v Times Newspapers [2002] QB 783, [2001] EWCA Civ 1805 (05 December [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] multiple publication rule was established in Duke of Brunswick v Harmer (1849) 14 QB 185 (already discussed on this blog), reaffirmed in Loutchansky v Times Newspapers [2002] QB 783, [2001] EWCA Civ 1805 (05 December [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Death of a libel tourist</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/article-10-and-the-duke-of-brunswick/comment-page-1/#comment-10463</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Death of a libel tourist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=2058#comment-10463</guid>
		<description>[...] libel laws dating back to 1849 continue to stifle Americans’ constitutional right to free [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] libel laws dating back to 1849 continue to stifle Americans’ constitutional right to free [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Index on Censorship &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The end of libel tourism?</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/article-10-and-the-duke-of-brunswick/comment-page-1/#comment-10447</link>
		<dc:creator>Index on Censorship &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The end of libel tourism?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=2058#comment-10447</guid>
		<description>[...] American publishers and writers, in print and on the Internet. While these English libel laws date back to 1849, they continue to infringe Americans&#8217; constitutional right for free [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] American publishers and writers, in print and on the Internet. While these English libel laws date back to 1849, they continue to infringe Americans&#8217; constitutional right for free [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » FoE in the EHRLR</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/article-10-and-the-duke-of-brunswick/comment-page-1/#comment-10108</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » FoE in the EHRLR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 17:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=2058#comment-10108</guid>
		<description>[...] and the Duke’s Manservant—an American Perspective&#8221; [2009] 3 EHRLR 303, combining two topics which have featured here in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and the Duke’s Manservant—an American Perspective&#8221; [2009] 3 EHRLR 303, combining two topics which have featured here in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digitale archieven kwetsbaar voor smaadprocedures &#171; De nieuwe reporter</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/article-10-and-the-duke-of-brunswick/comment-page-1/#comment-8539</link>
		<dc:creator>Digitale archieven kwetsbaar voor smaadprocedures &#171; De nieuwe reporter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 07:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=2058#comment-8539</guid>
		<description>[...] (“First publication rule”). In Groot-Brittannië zegt de wet op basis van een Victoriaans precedent uit 1849 dat elke publicatie een nieuwe publicatie is (“internet publication rule”). In het [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (“First publication rule”). In Groot-Brittannië zegt de wet op basis van een Victoriaans precedent uit 1849 dat elke publicatie een nieuwe publicatie is (“internet publication rule”). In het [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
