<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Article 10 and the Duke of Brunswick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/article-10-and-the-duke-of-brunswick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/article-10-and-the-duke-of-brunswick/</link>
	<description>the Irish for rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:43:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Multiple publication; multiple reform?</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/article-10-and-the-duke-of-brunswick/comment-page-1/#comment-24736</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Multiple publication; multiple reform?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 06:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=2058#comment-24736</guid>
		<description>[...] common law, the rule in Duke of Brunswick v Harmer (1849) 14 QB 185 established that each individual publication of a libel gives rise to a separate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] common law, the rule in Duke of Brunswick v Harmer (1849) 14 QB 185 established that each individual publication of a libel gives rise to a separate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robeferre24</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/article-10-and-the-duke-of-brunswick/comment-page-1/#comment-18443</link>
		<dc:creator>robeferre24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 19:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=2058#comment-18443</guid>
		<description>I tried to publish a comment previously, although it has not shown up. I assume your spam filter might be broken?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to publish a comment previously, although it has not shown up. I assume your spam filter might be broken?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Libel tourism, online defamation and multiple publication</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/article-10-and-the-duke-of-brunswick/comment-page-1/#comment-10480</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Libel tourism, online defamation and multiple publication</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=2058#comment-10480</guid>
		<description>[...] multiple publication rule was established in Duke of Brunswick v Harmer (1849) 14 QB 185 (already discussed on this blog), reaffirmed in Loutchansky v Times Newspapers [2002] QB 783, [2001] EWCA Civ 1805 (05 December [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] multiple publication rule was established in Duke of Brunswick v Harmer (1849) 14 QB 185 (already discussed on this blog), reaffirmed in Loutchansky v Times Newspapers [2002] QB 783, [2001] EWCA Civ 1805 (05 December [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Death of a libel tourist</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/article-10-and-the-duke-of-brunswick/comment-page-1/#comment-10463</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Death of a libel tourist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=2058#comment-10463</guid>
		<description>[...] libel laws dating back to 1849 continue to stifle Americans’ constitutional right to free [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] libel laws dating back to 1849 continue to stifle Americans’ constitutional right to free [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Index on Censorship &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The end of libel tourism?</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/article-10-and-the-duke-of-brunswick/comment-page-1/#comment-10447</link>
		<dc:creator>Index on Censorship &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The end of libel tourism?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=2058#comment-10447</guid>
		<description>[...] American publishers and writers, in print and on the Internet. While these English libel laws date back to 1849, they continue to infringe Americans&#8217; constitutional right for free [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] American publishers and writers, in print and on the Internet. While these English libel laws date back to 1849, they continue to infringe Americans&#8217; constitutional right for free [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

