<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Covert surveillance, privilege, and iniquity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/covert-surveillance-privilege-and-iniquity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/covert-surveillance-privilege-and-iniquity/</link>
	<description>the Irish for rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:43:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Journalists&#8217; source privilege: one privilege or two?</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/covert-surveillance-privilege-and-iniquity/comment-page-1/#comment-8530</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Journalists&#8217; source privilege: one privilege or two?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 10:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=2083#comment-8530</guid>
		<description>[...] common lawyers think about journalists&#8217; source privilege, conditioned by classic common law privileges, they often think about a privilege for sources by which journalists are bound [the sources&#039; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] common lawyers think about journalists&#8217; source privilege, conditioned by classic common law privileges, they often think about a privilege for sources by which journalists are bound [the sources' [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

