<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is compulsory judicial retirement constitutional? or judicious?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/is-compulsory-judicial-retirement-constitutional-or-judicious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/is-compulsory-judicial-retirement-constitutional-or-judicious/</link>
	<description>the Irish for rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:53:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: insurance quotes and annuities</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/is-compulsory-judicial-retirement-constitutional-or-judicious/comment-page-1/#comment-11892</link>
		<dc:creator>insurance quotes and annuities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 05:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=2007#comment-11892</guid>
		<description>Very interesting, Ive wondered about the lawfulness of compulsory judicial retirement and reported on the European Court of Justice’s judgment in the Age Concern case</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting, Ive wondered about the lawfulness of compulsory judicial retirement and reported on the European Court of Justice’s judgment in the Age Concern case</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary in St Petersburg</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/is-compulsory-judicial-retirement-constitutional-or-judicious/comment-page-1/#comment-8534</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary in St Petersburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 15:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=2007#comment-8534</guid>
		<description>This is a topic which hits close to home, as my father-in-law is undergoing this very same process.  I truly feel that retirement should be judged on an individual, case-by-case basis.  To force people to work within these generalized parameters is unfair, especially since the cost of living is only going to continue to increase.  Each of us is unique and that goes the same for our individual abilities and capabilities.  Thank you for letting me share on the topic, all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a topic which hits close to home, as my father-in-law is undergoing this very same process.  I truly feel that retirement should be judged on an individual, case-by-case basis.  To force people to work within these generalized parameters is unfair, especially since the cost of living is only going to continue to increase.  Each of us is unique and that goes the same for our individual abilities and capabilities.  Thank you for letting me share on the topic, all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: online term insurance</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/is-compulsory-judicial-retirement-constitutional-or-judicious/comment-page-1/#comment-8042</link>
		<dc:creator>online term insurance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=2007#comment-8042</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure. On the one hand you have judges who, if they get too old, may not be able to do their job effectively (due to cognitive decline). On the other hand, why should a judge have to be forced into retirement if he IS mentally competent to serve on the bench. 

As long as the justice he or she is doling out isn&#039;t compromised, keep them on the bench, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure. On the one hand you have judges who, if they get too old, may not be able to do their job effectively (due to cognitive decline). On the other hand, why should a judge have to be forced into retirement if he IS mentally competent to serve on the bench. </p>
<p>As long as the justice he or she is doling out isn&#8217;t compromised, keep them on the bench, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Bentham and judicial retirement</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/is-compulsory-judicial-retirement-constitutional-or-judicious/comment-page-1/#comment-7703</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Bentham and judicial retirement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=2007#comment-7703</guid>
		<description>[...] in today&#8217;s Times, taking the field on an issue I&#8217;ve looked at already on this blog (here and here); some extracts: Seventy is far too early for a supreme court judge to retire . . [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in today&#8217;s Times, taking the field on an issue I&#8217;ve looked at already on this blog (here and here); some extracts: Seventy is far too early for a supreme court judge to retire . . [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blawg Review #202 is now up &#171; Insitelaw magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/is-compulsory-judicial-retirement-constitutional-or-judicious/comment-page-1/#comment-7083</link>
		<dc:creator>Blawg Review #202 is now up &#171; Insitelaw magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=2007#comment-7083</guid>
		<description>[...] Cearta.ie: Is compulsory judicial retirement constitutional? or judicious? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cearta.ie: Is compulsory judicial retirement constitutional? or judicious? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
