<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The good, the bad, and the ugly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cearta.ie/2009/04/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/04/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/</link>
	<description>the Irish for rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:43:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Massaging the political advertising ban</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/04/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/comment-page-1/#comment-11255</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Massaging the political advertising ban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=2392#comment-11255</guid>
		<description>[...] sub-section (in conjunction with section 41(4), which contains a ban on religious advertising) re-enacts long-standing bans on political (and religious) advertising; though such a ban is unlikely [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sub-section (in conjunction with section 41(4), which contains a ban on religious advertising) re-enacts long-standing bans on political (and religious) advertising; though such a ban is unlikely [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Where stands the Defamation Bill, 2006 on the Government&#8217;s legislative agenda?</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/04/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/comment-page-1/#comment-8080</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Where stands the Defamation Bill, 2006 on the Government&#8217;s legislative agenda?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=2392#comment-8080</guid>
		<description>[...] According to the Dáil Éireann Order Paper for 22 April 2009 (pdf), this includes the long-delayed Defamation Bill, 2006. The Minister for Justice, Dermot Ahern, has recently stated his hope that the Bill would become [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] According to the Dáil Éireann Order Paper for 22 April 2009 (pdf), this includes the long-delayed Defamation Bill, 2006. The Minister for Justice, Dermot Ahern, has recently stated his hope that the Bill would become [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Cowengate and seditious libel</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/04/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/comment-page-1/#comment-7880</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Cowengate and seditious libel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 10:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=2392#comment-7880</guid>
		<description>[...] for Ireland, the Minister for Justice suggested this week that we could see the enactment of the Defamation Bill, 2006 before the summer. Since it was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for Ireland, the Minister for Justice suggested this week that we could see the enactment of the Defamation Bill, 2006 before the summer. Since it was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

