Comments on: FoE in the EHRLR http://www.cearta.ie/2009/08/foe-in-the-ehrlr/ the Irish for rights Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:43:36 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: cearta.ie » Blasphemy and the European Court of Human Rights http://www.cearta.ie/2009/08/foe-in-the-ehrlr/comment-page-1/#comment-15377 cearta.ie » Blasphemy and the European Court of Human Rights Tue, 07 Dec 2010 09:32:14 +0000 http://www.cearta.ie/?p=3382#comment-15377 [...] to Freedom of Expression and the International Human Rights System” [2009] 3 EHRLR 353, noted here. Other relevant ECHR cases [...] [...] to Freedom of Expression and the International Human Rights System” [2009] 3 EHRLR 353, noted here. Other relevant ECHR cases [...]

]]> By: Fergus O'Rourke http://www.cearta.ie/2009/08/foe-in-the-ehrlr/comment-page-1/#comment-10342 Fergus O'Rourke Fri, 28 Aug 2009 06:46:16 +0000 http://www.cearta.ie/?p=3382#comment-10342 I have three principal public policy concerns at present: Lisbon Treaty, NAMA and media law. Only on NAMA is there any true pluralism, external or internal. It is fairly difficult for the unsuspecting reader to avoid being bulldozed into submission by pro-Lisbon propaganda. On the rights of others as against the owners and employees of the media, it is almost impossible to find any advocacy. I have three principal public policy concerns at present: Lisbon Treaty, NAMA and media law.

Only on NAMA is there any true pluralism, external or internal. It is fairly difficult for the unsuspecting reader to avoid being bulldozed into submission by pro-Lisbon propaganda. On the rights of others as against the owners and employees of the media, it is almost impossible to find any advocacy.

]]> By: cearta.ie » Stop Press: Vincent Browne recants! http://www.cearta.ie/2009/08/foe-in-the-ehrlr/comment-page-1/#comment-10248 cearta.ie » Stop Press: Vincent Browne recants! Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:46:35 +0000 http://www.cearta.ie/?p=3382#comment-10248 [...] outlets. However, proper – and actively enforced – regulation about cross-ownership and pluralism would go a long way to meeting his objections, without having to recant his youthful enthusiasm for [...] [...] outlets. However, proper – and actively enforced – regulation about cross-ownership and pluralism would go a long way to meeting his objections, without having to recant his youthful enthusiasm for [...]

]]>