<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fulsome pedantry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cearta.ie/2009/09/fulsome-pedantry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/09/fulsome-pedantry/</link>
	<description>the Irish for rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:43:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan Ishibashi</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/09/fulsome-pedantry/comment-page-1/#comment-23767</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Ishibashi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=3708#comment-23767</guid>
		<description>Hah! I think we&#039;ve all be guilty at one time or another of using words we don&#039;t quite know the meaning of. It&#039;s obviously a tad embarrassing when you&#039;re called out on it, but in the case of fulsome, correcting its usage sounds like a losing battle! 

It&#039;s just one of those words now that you have to judge from the context it&#039;s used in. It could mean one thing, or the opposite!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah! I think we&#8217;ve all be guilty at one time or another of using words we don&#8217;t quite know the meaning of. It&#8217;s obviously a tad embarrassing when you&#8217;re called out on it, but in the case of fulsome, correcting its usage sounds like a losing battle! </p>
<p>It&#8217;s just one of those words now that you have to judge from the context it&#8217;s used in. It could mean one thing, or the opposite!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/09/fulsome-pedantry/comment-page-1/#comment-19970</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=3708#comment-19970</guid>
		<description>I very rarely hear/see the word &quot;fulsome&quot; or &quot;pedantry&quot; used, let alone together. Nicely done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I very rarely hear/see the word &#8220;fulsome&#8221; or &#8220;pedantry&#8221; used, let alone together. Nicely done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus Walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/09/fulsome-pedantry/comment-page-1/#comment-19887</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=3708#comment-19887</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure I&#039;ve only ever heard fulsome used incorrectly. To be honest, I also thought it meant for something to be full. I think it&#039;s a bit of a runaway error. Basically a meme now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure I&#8217;ve only ever heard fulsome used incorrectly. To be honest, I also thought it meant for something to be full. I think it&#8217;s a bit of a runaway error. Basically a meme now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rene</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/09/fulsome-pedantry/comment-page-1/#comment-19886</link>
		<dc:creator>rene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 04:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=3708#comment-19886</guid>
		<description>You wouldn&#039;t happen to be talking about [...*] now, would you? I think I remember him using the word in one of his speeches. I giggled a little bit when I heard him say it and I wondered why his speech writer decided to use that word.

[* I&#039;ve edited the name out here: E0D]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wouldn&#8217;t happen to be talking about [...*] now, would you? I think I remember him using the word in one of his speeches. I giggled a little bit when I heard him say it and I wondered why his speech writer decided to use that word.</p>
<p>[* I've edited the name out here: E0D]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/09/fulsome-pedantry/comment-page-1/#comment-19869</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=3708#comment-19869</guid>
		<description>I initially had fulsome praise for your post, but figured just plain old praise would suffice.

But seriously, it is interesting how words can have contradicting meanings. I&#039;m pretty suer I never would have dug in to a word such as &quot;fulsome&quot; had it not been for this post.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I initially had fulsome praise for your post, but figured just plain old praise would suffice.</p>
<p>But seriously, it is interesting how words can have contradicting meanings. I&#8217;m pretty suer I never would have dug in to a word such as &#8220;fulsome&#8221; had it not been for this post.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

