<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ban on corporate donations could face legal action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cearta.ie/2009/10/ban-on-corporate-donations-could-face-legal-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/10/ban-on-corporate-donations-could-face-legal-action/</link>
	<description>the Irish for rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:43:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Massaging the political advertising ban</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/10/ban-on-corporate-donations-could-face-legal-action/comment-page-1/#comment-11268</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Massaging the political advertising ban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=4199#comment-11268</guid>
		<description>[...] sub-section (in conjunction with section 41(4), which contains a ban on religious advertising) re-enacts long-standing bans on political (and religious) advertising; though such a ban is unlikely to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sub-section (in conjunction with section 41(4), which contains a ban on religious advertising) re-enacts long-standing bans on political (and religious) advertising; though such a ban is unlikely to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tipster</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/10/ban-on-corporate-donations-could-face-legal-action/comment-page-1/#comment-10996</link>
		<dc:creator>Tipster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=4199#comment-10996</guid>
		<description>On a very different legal issue on free speech in Ireland, albeit not of the High or Supreme Court Constitutional precedent setting level is the following recent decision in the Equality Tribunal on online discussion forums as a source of harassment contrary to the Equal Status Acts:

http://www.equalitytribunal.ie/index.asp?locID=165&amp;docID=2138</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a very different legal issue on free speech in Ireland, albeit not of the High or Supreme Court Constitutional precedent setting level is the following recent decision in the Equality Tribunal on online discussion forums as a source of harassment contrary to the Equal Status Acts:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.equalitytribunal.ie/index.asp?locID=165&amp;docID=2138">http://www.equalitytribunal.ie/index.asp?locID=165&amp;docID=2138</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

