<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defamation Act 2009 (Commencement) Order 2009 (SI No 517 of 2009)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cearta.ie/2009/12/defamation-act-2009-commencement-order-2009-si-no-517-of-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/12/defamation-act-2009-commencement-order-2009-si-no-517-of-2009/</link>
	<description>the Irish for rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:47:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » SI No 511 of 2009: Rules of the Superior Courts (Defamation) 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/12/defamation-act-2009-commencement-order-2009-si-no-517-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-24634</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » SI No 511 of 2009: Rules of the Superior Courts (Defamation) 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=4644#comment-24634</guid>
		<description>[...] into effect of the Defamation Act, 2009 from 23 July 2009 when it was signed by the President until 1 January 2010 was the need to amend the Rules of the Superior Court to provide for the changes to practice and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] into effect of the Defamation Act, 2009 from 23 July 2009 when it was signed by the President until 1 January 2010 was the need to amend the Rules of the Superior Court to provide for the changes to practice and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Sleepwalking into an obscene damages award</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/12/defamation-act-2009-commencement-order-2009-si-no-517-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-14546</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Sleepwalking into an obscene damages award</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=4644#comment-14546</guid>
		<description>[...] further astray. All four cases were taken before the recent Defamation Act, 2009 (also here) came into force on 1 January this year. That Act makes several [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] further astray. All four cases were taken before the recent Defamation Act, 2009 (also here) came into force on 1 January this year. That Act makes several [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Referendum should thoroughly revise free speech clause</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/12/defamation-act-2009-commencement-order-2009-si-no-517-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-12433</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Referendum should thoroughly revise free speech clause</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=4644#comment-12433</guid>
		<description>[...] 5 of the Defamation Act, 2009 (also here), which came into effect on 1 January this year, controversially makes blasphemy a criminal offence. In the view of the Minister for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 5 of the Defamation Act, 2009 (also here), which came into effect on 1 January this year, controversially makes blasphemy a criminal offence. In the view of the Minister for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Trouble in the Blog O’Sphere</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/12/defamation-act-2009-commencement-order-2009-si-no-517-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-12124</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Trouble in the Blog O’Sphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=4644#comment-12124</guid>
		<description>[...] libel laws have recently been overhauled by the Defamation Act, 2009, which came into force on 1 January this year. Section 31(4) provides that the court in a defamation action shall have regard to a range of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] libel laws have recently been overhauled by the Defamation Act, 2009, which came into force on 1 January this year. Section 31(4) provides that the court in a defamation action shall have regard to a range of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Blasphemous rumours and constitutional amendments</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/12/defamation-act-2009-commencement-order-2009-si-no-517-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-11873</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Blasphemous rumours and constitutional amendments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 08:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=4644#comment-11873</guid>
		<description>[...] there is a slim chance that the controversy over the blasphemy provisions in Part 5 of the newly-commenced Defamation Act, 2009 might provide an opportunity to replace the current text of Article 40.6.1(i) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there is a slim chance that the controversy over the blasphemy provisions in Part 5 of the newly-commenced Defamation Act, 2009 might provide an opportunity to replace the current text of Article 40.6.1(i) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

