<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blasphemous rumours and constitutional amendments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cearta.ie/2010/01/blasphemous-rumours-and-constitutional-amendments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2010/01/blasphemous-rumours-and-constitutional-amendments/</link>
	<description>the Irish for rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 01:43:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Blasphemy from Ireland to Indonesia via South Park</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2010/01/blasphemous-rumours-and-constitutional-amendments/comment-page-1/#comment-12798</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Blasphemy from Ireland to Indonesia via South Park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=4732#comment-12798</guid>
		<description>[...] is welcome, but doesn&#8217;t go far enough: the entire free speech clause should be thoroughly reformed (especially if there is to be a convention to develop a new constitution). Of course, this might [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is welcome, but doesn&#8217;t go far enough: the entire free speech clause should be thoroughly reformed (especially if there is to be a convention to develop a new constitution). Of course, this might [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Oh no, it&#8217;s yet another post about blasphemy; oh yes, it is</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2010/01/blasphemous-rumours-and-constitutional-amendments/comment-page-1/#comment-12506</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Oh no, it&#8217;s yet another post about blasphemy; oh yes, it is</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 19:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=4732#comment-12506</guid>
		<description>[...] the common law offences of blasphemy and blasphemous libel. On the other hand, in Ireland, the already-notorious section 36 of the Defamation Act, 2009, goes in precisely the opposite direction, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the common law offences of blasphemy and blasphemous libel. On the other hand, in Ireland, the already-notorious section 36 of the Defamation Act, 2009, goes in precisely the opposite direction, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Referendum should thoroughly revise free speech clause</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2010/01/blasphemous-rumours-and-constitutional-amendments/comment-page-1/#comment-12401</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Referendum should thoroughly revise free speech clause</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=4732#comment-12401</guid>
		<description>[...] full text of a possible alternative is available here.    If you like this post, please click on this link to pass it on. Thanks!                    Hide [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] full text of a possible alternative is available here.    If you like this post, please click on this link to pass it on. Thanks!                    Hide [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blawg Review #247 &#124; a public defender</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2010/01/blasphemous-rumours-and-constitutional-amendments/comment-page-1/#comment-11998</link>
		<dc:creator>Blawg Review #247 &#124; a public defender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 05:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=4732#comment-11998</guid>
		<description>[...] ignorance and conscientious stupidity to an entirely new level are two stories: a new &#8220;blasphemy law&#8221; in Ireland, which makes it a crime to, well, blaspheme; and the dogged pursuit by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ignorance and conscientious stupidity to an entirely new level are two stories: a new &#8220;blasphemy law&#8221; in Ireland, which makes it a crime to, well, blaspheme; and the dogged pursuit by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2010/01/blasphemous-rumours-and-constitutional-amendments/comment-page-1/#comment-11996</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 01:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=4732#comment-11996</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by cearta: http://tinyurl.com/ybkr42p My new blogpost: Blasphemous rumours and constitutional amendments...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by cearta: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ybkr42p">http://tinyurl.com/ybkr42p</a> My new blogpost: Blasphemous rumours and constitutional amendments&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

