<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">

<channel>
	<title>cearta.ie &#187; ECHR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cearta.ie/category/echr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cearta.ie</link>
	<description>the Irish for rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 00:59:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>		<item>
		<title>The Margin of Appreciation in the ECHR</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/07/the-margin-of-appreciation-in-the-echr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/07/the-margin-of-appreciation-in-the-echr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 07:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ECHR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=7704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ever-informative ECHR blog brings news of an interesting article on the margin of appreciation jurisprudence of the European Convention on Human Rights (which has been examined on this blog here and here). It is the doctrine by which the ECHR affords Members States some initial latitude to assess the impact of a restriction upon [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/07/the-margin-of-appreciation-in-the-echr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retention of DNA, and the effect of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/01/retention-of-dna-and-the-effect-of-decisions-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/01/retention-of-dna-and-the-effect-of-decisions-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ECHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irish Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=7145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An article in today&#8217;s Daily Telegraph raises important issues relating to the retention of the DNA of innocent persons by the police in both the UK and Ireland. It also raises profound questions as to the effect of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in domestic law. 
According to the Telegraph:
The [UK's] Coalition [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/01/retention-of-dna-and-the-effect-of-decisions-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Campbell&#8217;s costs and journalists&#8217; sources</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/01/campbells-costs-and-journalists-sources/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/01/campbells-costs-and-journalists-sources/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ECHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalists' sources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=5795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Even the judges know who Naomi Campbell is&#8221;. At least Baroness Hale of Richmond does, since this is how she began her speech in Campbell v MGN [2004] AC 457, [2004] UKHL 22 (6 May 2004), in which she was a member of the majority which held that aspects of the Mirror&#8217;s coverage of Naomi [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/01/campbells-costs-and-journalists-sources/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blasphemy and the European Court of Human Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2010/12/blasphemy-and-the-european-court-of-human-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cearta.ie/2010/12/blasphemy-and-the-european-court-of-human-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 09:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blasphemy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECHR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=6689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert A Kahn (University of St Thomas School of Law, Minnesota) A Margin of Appreciation for Muslims? Viewing the Defamation of Religions Debate Through Otto-Preminger-Institut v Austria (abstract; via SSRN):
Critics of the global standard outlawing defamation of religions often view the proposal as an effort by radical Muslims to deprive the liberal West of long-held [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cearta.ie/2010/12/blasphemy-and-the-european-court-of-human-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gallimaufry</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2010/11/gallimaufry-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cearta.ie/2010/11/gallimaufry-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 05:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blasphemy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcasting Authority of Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gallimaufry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Typography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phones in class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wi fi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=6062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr Johnson defined gallimaufry as
1. A hoch-poch &#8230;
2. Any inconsistent or ridiculous medley. &#8230;
Here&#8217;s another hoch-poch, or hotch-potch (though, of course, not a hotchpot) of links relevant to the themes of this blog that have caught my eye over the last while. I&#8217;ll begin and end with some stories of censorship, and along the way [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cearta.ie/2010/11/gallimaufry-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

