<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">

<channel>
	<title>cearta.ie &#187; Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cearta.ie/category/law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cearta.ie</link>
	<description>the Irish for rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 00:59:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>		<item>
		<title>What is the Preamble to a Constitution for?</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/07/what-is-the-preamble-to-a-constitution-for-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/07/what-is-the-preamble-to-a-constitution-for-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=7684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I posed the question in title in an earlier post on this blog. In an article published in the current issue of the International Journal of Constitutional Law, Liav Orgad provides one possible answer. Here is the abstract:
Liav Orgad &#8220;The preamble in constitutional interpretation&#8221; (2011) 8 (4) I•CON 714-738
From Plato&#8217;s Laws through common law and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/07/what-is-the-preamble-to-a-constitution-for-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canadian style</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/11/canadian-style/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/11/canadian-style/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 06:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Journals and Law Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=4322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, this isn&#8217;t a post about the Canadian blog and magazine Precedent: The new rules of law and style. Instead &#8211; following on from my posts about OSCOLA (here), the infamous Bluebook (here), minimalist styles for online journals (here), and an emerging Kiwi style (here) &#8211; this is a rather belated comment on a post [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/11/canadian-style/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Televising the Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/10/televising-the-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/10/televising-the-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court dress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=4013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, not the Irish Supreme Court, but the new UK Supreme Court. There&#8217;s quite a lot of coverage in the UK media and blawgopshere today about the new Court at the apex of UK&#8217;s judicial system, which opens for business today, on time and on budget, in a refurbished former criminal court, after a difficult [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/10/televising-the-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Towards an All Black Book?</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/08/towards-an-all-black-book/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/08/towards-an-all-black-book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Journals and Law Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=3485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By way of update to my post on Legal Citation, I note that Geoff McLay on 15 Lambton Quay (the Faculty Blog for the Victoria University of Wellington Faculty of Law) writes:
The proposed uniform legal style guide for New Zealand
A group of academics, editors and publishers led by myself and Justice Chambers has been developing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/08/towards-an-all-black-book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So, does Irish law now recognise a journalist source privilege?</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/08/so-does-irish-law-now-recognise-a-journalist-source-privilege/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/08/so-does-irish-law-now-recognise-a-journalist-source-privilege/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 14:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ECHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irish Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irish Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irish cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalists' sources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=3184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I wrote in my previous post, the Supreme Court in Mahon Tribunal v Keena [2009] IESC 64 (31 July 2009) (also here (pdf)) allowed the appeal against the decision of the High Court in Mahon v Keena [2007] IEHC 348 (23 October 2007). Fennelly J delivered the judgment of the Court, in which Murray [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/08/so-does-irish-law-now-recognise-a-journalist-source-privilege/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

