<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">

<channel>
	<title>cearta.ie &#187; Privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cearta.ie/category/privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cearta.ie</link>
	<description>the Irish for rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 00:59:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>		<item>
		<title>Privates on parade: privacy in public (again)</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/03/privates-on-parade-privacy-in-public-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/03/privates-on-parade-privacy-in-public-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=7318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a now-infamous wardrobe malfunction in the course of the half-time entertainment for Super Bowl XXXVIII (2004), during a duet between Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake, Timberlake fleetingly exposed Jackson&#8217;s right breast, which was adorned with a large nipple shield (the pair are pictured left immediately after the incident). In an exciting game, the New [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/03/privates-on-parade-privacy-in-public-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retention of DNA, and the effect of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/01/retention-of-dna-and-the-effect-of-decisions-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/01/retention-of-dna-and-the-effect-of-decisions-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ECHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irish Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=7145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An article in today&#8217;s Daily Telegraph raises important issues relating to the retention of the DNA of innocent persons by the police in both the UK and Ireland. It also raises profound questions as to the effect of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in domestic law. 
According to the Telegraph:
The [UK's] Coalition [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/01/retention-of-dna-and-the-effect-of-decisions-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nothing to hide, nothing to fear?</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/01/nothing-to-hide-nothing-to-fear/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/01/nothing-to-hide-nothing-to-fear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data retention]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=7137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A cartoon for the week which saw both international data privacy day and the enactment of the Communications (Retention of Data) Act, 2011 (No 3 of 2011, not yet available on pdf, but see the Oireachtas site for the Bill; update: noted here by Rossa McMahon), via philosophyblog:





Woman behind shower curtain: Hey! What about my [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/01/nothing-to-hide-nothing-to-fear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Campbell&#8217;s costs and journalists&#8217; sources</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/01/campbells-costs-and-journalists-sources/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/01/campbells-costs-and-journalists-sources/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ECHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalists' sources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=5795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Even the judges know who Naomi Campbell is&#8221;. At least Baroness Hale of Richmond does, since this is how she began her speech in Campbell v MGN [2004] AC 457, [2004] UKHL 22 (6 May 2004), in which she was a member of the majority which held that aspects of the Mirror&#8217;s coverage of Naomi [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/01/campbells-costs-and-journalists-sources/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do I hear drumbeats for privacy legislation?</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/01/do-i-hear-drumbeats-for-privacy-legislation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/01/do-i-hear-drumbeats-for-privacy-legislation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Lenihan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=4845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
And they&#8217;ll just put you in the spotlight
And hope that you&#8217;ll do alright
Or maybe not
Now why do you wanna go
and put starz in their eyes?
Why do you wanna go
and put starz in their eyes? 
Just Jack, Starz in Their Eyes
Drumbeats for privacy protection in the face of press intrusion are most often raised by politicians [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/01/do-i-hear-drumbeats-for-privacy-legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

