In a welcome example of enlightened self interest, US law firm Morrison & Foerster realised that they had “a vast resource of privacy materials” arising out of their world-wide practice in the area, and they have taken the unusual but highly commenable step of making the fruits of their own research available as a dedicated Privacy Library on their website (see the press release here; hat tip Concurring Opinions). Although not an entirely altrusitic endeavour, it is nonetheless a superb resource, with links not only to US Federal and State legislation, but also to many other countries and multilateral organisations. It seems to be a great place to find otherwise hard to locate primary privacy materials.

Here’s a screen-shot of the Ireland page:


















This is basically the information about data protection available on the Data Protection Commissioner’s website; it would be churlish to point out that it doesn’t yet have our data retention legislation (Part 7 of the Criminal Justice (Terrorist Offences) Act, 2005), or a link to the Privacy Bill, 2006 (pdf). And it won’t replace EPIC or Privacy International. For all that, though, it is an extremely useful store of privacy materials; and Morrison & Foerster are to be commended for their initiative in making it available.

As I was having a look this evening at the various manifestos on the political parties’ websites, I wondered what each of them might have to say about the kinds of issues discussed on this blog. Read the rest of this entry »

By way of update to my earlier data retention post, five points. Read the rest of this entry »

Digital Rights Ireland (of which I am a Director) is making the running against Irish and European data retention legislation (see, for example, Part 7 of the Criminal Justice (Terrorist Offences) Act, 2005 in Ireland, and the EU Data Retention Directive 2006/24/EC).

However, and unfortunately, Ireland is not the only country in which government seeks to compel the retention of its citizens’ traffic data; in fact, the phenomenon of data retention is fast becoming ubiquituous; unsurprisingly, therefore, it’s happening too in the US. The Centre for Democracy and Technology (CDT) has just published an analysis of various bills pending before the Congress (pdf) in which the legitimate aim of the protection of children online is used as cover for alarming government intrusion on all aspects of online life. Given that law enforcement agencies want to be able to monitor significant traffic data (to say nothing of the traffic itself), it is perhaps to be expected that they should attempt to justify that end on this child-protection basis. However, reflecting a CDT report (pdf) of last June on data retention generally, this week’s report cogently summarizes the case against data retention in language as applicable in Ireland and Europe as it is in the US. Read the rest of this entry »