<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">

<channel>
	<title>cearta.ie &#187; Defamation Act 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cearta.ie/tag/defamation-act-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cearta.ie</link>
	<description>the Irish for rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 00:59:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>		<item>
		<title>Is the Press Council system working?</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/04/is-the-press-council-system-working/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/04/is-the-press-council-system-working/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Press Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defamation Act 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defamation Bill 2006]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=7454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the recent publication by the Press Council and the Office of the Press Ombudsman of their Annual Report 2010 (Report (pdf) &#124; Press Release), it is an opportune time to consider whether the system of press self-regulation by those two bodies is working. I think that, overall, the answer must be yes. Within the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/04/is-the-press-council-system-working/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prior restraint and permanent injunctions in defamation cases</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/02/prior-restraint-and-permanent-injunctions-in-defamation-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/02/prior-restraint-and-permanent-injunctions-in-defamation-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 07:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defamation Act 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prior restraint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=6897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Watters v Independent Star [2010] IECC 1 (03 November 2010), the first reported judgment on the Defamation Act, 2009 (also here), Matthews J granted the plaintiff a declaratory order pursuant to section 28 of the Act (also here) that an article published by the defendant was defamatory, and he made a further order pursuant [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/02/prior-restraint-and-permanent-injunctions-in-defamation-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prior restraint and temporary injunctions in defamation cases</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/02/prior-restraint-and-temporary-injunctions-in-defamation-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/02/prior-restraint-and-temporary-injunctions-in-defamation-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defamation Act 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prior restraint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=6852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some orders have been made on foot of the Defamation Act, 2009 (also here) &#8211; see, for example, Lowry v Smyth (background here and here; coverage of the order here), Mellon v Associated Newspapers (coverage here), and Meegan v Associated Newspapers (coverage here) &#8211; but Watters v Independent Star [2010] IECC 1 (03 November 2010) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cearta.ie/2011/02/prior-restraint-and-temporary-injunctions-in-defamation-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judgment reserved in Lowry v Smyth</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2010/12/judgment-reserved-in-lowry-v-smyth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cearta.ie/2010/12/judgment-reserved-in-lowry-v-smyth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defamation Act 2009]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=6793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Watters v Independent Star [2010] IECC 1 (3 November 2010) Matthews J in the Circuit Court handed down the first reserved decision under the Defamation Act, 2009 (also here). We will soon have the second. The politician Michael Lowry TD (pictured left) has taken a defamation action against journalist Sam Smyth over comments Smyth [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cearta.ie/2010/12/judgment-reserved-in-lowry-v-smyth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reshaping the Law for the Digital Economy &#8211; II &#8211; the liability of intermediaries</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2010/11/reshaping-the-law-for-the-digital-economy-ii-the-liability-of-intermediaries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cearta.ie/2010/11/reshaping-the-law-for-the-digital-economy-ii-the-liability-of-intermediaries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 06:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conferences, Lectures, Papers and Workshops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyberlaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defamation Act 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=6491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I said my first post yesterday, last Friday morning I attended a seminar on Promoting innovation &#8211; Reshaping the Law for the Digital Economy, hosted by Google Ireland, co-sponsored by the Institute for International and European Affairs (IIEA), and chaired by TJ McIntyre. In that post, I summarized the presentations by Johnny Ryan (the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cearta.ie/2010/11/reshaping-the-law-for-the-digital-economy-ii-the-liability-of-intermediaries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

