<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">

<channel>
	<title>cearta.ie &#187; older people</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cearta.ie/tag/older-people/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cearta.ie</link>
	<description>the Irish for rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 00:59:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>		<item>
		<title>Have older people in private nursing homes received a fair deal from the State?</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2010/11/have-older-people-in-private-nursing-homes-received-a-fair-deal-from-the-state/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cearta.ie/2010/11/have-older-people-in-private-nursing-homes-received-a-fair-deal-from-the-state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 01:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Restitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[older people]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=6252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Ombudsman yesterday published Who Cares? An Investigation into the Right to Nursing Home Care in Ireland. The gist of the Report is that the State is failing in its legal obligations to older people in need of nursing home care. Moreover, the Ombudsman was sharply critical of the refusal of the Government and State [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cearta.ie/2010/11/have-older-people-in-private-nursing-homes-received-a-fair-deal-from-the-state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bentham and judicial retirement</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/bentham-and-judicial-retirement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/bentham-and-judicial-retirement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[older people]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=2230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) (left) was a utilitarian philosopher, whose radical ideas on education inspired those who founded University College London. Nowadays, the Bentham Association (formerly the Bentham Club) is the Alumni Association for UCL&#8217;s lawyers, and it annually hosts a Presidential Address from an invited senior lawyer. This year&#8217;s address was given by Lord Pannick [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/bentham-and-judicial-retirement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mandatory retirement, again</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/mandatory-retirement-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/mandatory-retirement-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 07:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ECJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[older people]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=2020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my last post, I mentioned that the question of the compatibility of mandatory retirement ages with EU law was pending before the European Court of Justice (ECJ). The Court has now handed down its decision, upholding the principle of mandatory retirement ages, but requiring them to be justified on a high standard of proof.
The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/mandatory-retirement-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is compulsory judicial retirement constitutional? or judicious?</title>
		<link>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/is-compulsory-judicial-retirement-constitutional-or-judicious/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/is-compulsory-judicial-retirement-constitutional-or-judicious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eoin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[older people]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cearta.ie/?p=2007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The issue of compulsory retirement is not an uncommon one, but it arises today in an uncommon context. From today&#8217;s Times Online, 
Judges take on Ministry of Justice over age discrimination
Two judges this week have launched a discrimination claim against the Ministry of Justice over being forced to retire at 70.  &#8230; The claim [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cearta.ie/2009/03/is-compulsory-judicial-retirement-constitutional-or-judicious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

