the Irish for rights

For your consideration

Open University logoOver on Lex Ferenda, Daithí has an alarming-sounding post: Postgraduate diploma in Aisle Seven. But this is neither another of the many online fake degrees, nor yet Tesco moving into the education business, selling qualifications next to the chopped tomatoes and pasta. Rather, it is the news that points earned through Tesco’s Clubcard loyalty scheme can now be applied to fees at the Open University. Leaving aside questions about the privacy implications of loyalty card schemes, the power of supermarkets in our society, or even the ubiquity of Tesco, there is a very interesting issue here from the perspective of the Law of Contract.

For there to be a contract, there must be a serious agreement about a price. The law of contract judges whether there is an agreement by determining whether one party has made an offer which the other has accepted; one of the ways in which it judges whether the agreement is serious is by determining whether the parties have a sufficient intention to create legal relations; and it judges whether there is a price by means of the rules relating to consideration (which is nothing more than a long word for price). The law now takes the view that anything that can confer a benefit on the parties can count as consideration. Hence, as long ago as 1960, the courts accepted that wrappers from chocolate wrappers returned to a company as part of a promotion in part-exchange for a record could constitute good consideration. In Chappell & Co Ltd v Nestle Co Ltd [1960] AC 87 (HL), Lord Somervell said:

A contracting party can stipulate for what consideration he chooses. A peppercorn does not cease to be good consideration if it is established that the promisee does not like pepper and will throw away the corn. As the whole object of selling the record, if it was a sale, was to increase the sales of the chocolate, it seems to me wrong not to treat the stipulated evidence of such sales as part of the consideration.

The news that that the Open University is to take Tesco clubcard points in lieu of cash is simply another application of the same principle. The OU has decided that the receipt of clubcard points is of benefit to it; and the Chappell precedent suggests that the law would therefore have no difficulty in treating these points as good an valuable consideration in contracts between the OU and its students.

So, if you’re an OU student, when you’re shopping, you can, in a very real sense, also be buying your degree!

2 Responses to “For your consideration”

  1. Ruth Cannon says:

    Hi Eoin, love the blog! The broad view of consideration and intention to create legal relations taken in your post is borne out by the recent Irish decision of Kelly J in O’Keeffe v Ryanair, unreported, High Court, the 19th day of July, 2002 where it was held that the fact that the the plaintiff had consented to participate in the publicity given to her by Ryanair as the airline’s one millionth passenger constituted consideration for its promise to give her free air travel for life, stating that this participation “was regarded as being of value by the defendant and I see no reason why the law should not regard it as likewise being of value. The surrender by the plaintiff of her anonymity and privacy and her active participation in the generation of the publicity that was created on the day in question in my view amounted to a real consideration and sufficient to support a valid contractâ€?. He also rejected Ryanair’s argument that the promise was not intended to create legal relations, stating that
    “the onus of proving that there was no such intention is on the party who asserts that no legal effect is intended, and the onus is a heavy one.� Do you agree with these conclusions?

  2. Ruth Cannon says:

    PS for a recent issue involving Ryanair and unfair contract terms (in the UK) see

Leave a Reply



Me in a hatHi there! Thanks for dropping by. I’m Eoin O’Dell, and this is my blog: Cearta.ie – the Irish for rights.

“Cearta” really is the Irish word for rights, so the title provides a good sense of the scope of this blog.

In general, I write here about private law, free speech, and cyber law; and, in particular, I write about Irish law and education policy.

Academic links


  • RSS Feed
  • RSS Feed
  • Subscribe via Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Archives by month

Categories by topic

My recent tweets

Blogroll (or, really, a non-blogroll)

What I'd like for here is a simple widget that takes the list of feeds from my existing RSS reader and displays it here as a blogroll. Nothing fancy. I'd love a recommendation, if you have one.

I had built a blogroll here on my Google Reader RSS subscriptions. Google Reader produced a line of html for each RSS subscription category, each of which I pasted here. So I had a list of my subscriptions as my blogroll, organised by category, which updated whenever I edited Google Reader. Easy peasy. However, with the sad and unnecessary demise of that product, so also went this blogroll. Please take a moment to mourn Google Reader. If there's an RSS reader which provides a line of html for the list of subscriptions, or for each RSS subscription category as Google Reader did, I'd happily use that. So, as I've already begged, I'd love a recommendation, if you have one.

Meanwhile, please bear with me until I find a new RSS+Blogroll solution




Creative Commons License

This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. I am happy for you to reuse and adapt my content, provided that you attribute it to me, and do not use it commercially. Thanks. Eoin

Credit where it’s due

The image in the banner above is a detail from a photograph of the front of Trinity College Dublin night taken by Melanie May.

Others whose technical advice and help have proven invaluable in keeping this show on the road include Dermot Frost, Karlin Lillington, Daithí Mac Síthigh, and Antoin Ó Lachtnáin.

Thanks to Blacknight for hosting.