Hari Puttar image, via the BBC site.By way of updating my earlier post Is Harry Potter making a Parody of Copyright Law? the BBC has the following report:

Warner Bros lose Hari Puttar case

A court in the Indian capital Delhi has rejected a lawsuit filed by Hollywood company Warner Bros against the makers of a Bollywood film Hari Puttar. … The court said Warner Bros could have brought the case three years ago and said readers could easily distinguish Hari Puttar from Harry Potter. The court decision means the film can now be released in India. …

“The case has been dismissed. The court said that Warner Bros had known the title of the film since 2005 and had delayed bringing the case to court until the last moment,” lawyer Pratibha Singh was quoted by news agency AFP as saying. …

3 Responses to “Hari Puttar and the Delhi High Court”
  1. Ronan says:

    This is magic!

  2. [...] wrote a post earlier on the Harry Potter/Hari Puttar dispute between Warner Bros and Bollywood. Via cearta.ie, I see that the BBC reports that Warner Bros has failed in its case against the Hari Puttar [...]

  3. Eoin says:

    Update from Electromate:

    Harry Potter yet again in court (or trying to get millions magically)

    The Australian Daily Telegraph brings the news that the estate of Adrian Jacobs is suing JK Rowling’s publisher, Bloomsbury, for copyright infringement and claiming £500 million. The suit has its origin on the allegation that Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire contains the same concepts presented in Jacobs’ Willy the Wizard, a 36 page book of which 1,000 copies were made. …

  4.  
Leave a Reply


Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported
This work by Eoin O Dell is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported.