On the eternal question of what constitutes plagiarism, via Critical Mass, a post that speaks for itself:
Welcome to the desert of the real
I know you ask yourself constantly: “What does plagiarism look like in the age of simulacrum?” Now we know:
In 2007, after several high-profile plagiarism scandals, Southern Illinois University released a 17-page report on how to deal with the issue. The report includes a lengthy definition of plagiarism, explaining exactly what does and does not merit the dreaded “p” word.
One problem: That definition appears to have been plagiarized.
The 139-word definition used in the report is nearly identical to the definition adopted by Indiana University in 2005. …
… Now if I were a clever postmodernist, I would have just posted Margaret Soltan’s analogous post here in lieu of my own. But I’m not that clever …
Read more here.
Bonus links: A cheat, moi? That’s unfair (Times Higher; hat tip Ninth Level Ireland) | Can law students get away with plagiarism? | The Morality of Plagiarism | Plagiarism is Plagiarism or Why Readily Available Online Information Changes Nothing | What do you do about plagiarism | What do you do about plagiarism | Students turn to web plagiarism | Study shows ‘plagiarism epidemic’.
Entries (RSS)
Nice One…. the problem is endemic in law schools. I was an examiner for nearly 25 years and marking coursework could be a nightmare.
Always amused me when students lifted passages from my own course handbook. They could have showed a bit more style and gone for broke by extracting Chitty or Treitel! Mind you, I know both those works well… but give me some credit for knowing my own course textbooks!
[...] It’s Culture, Not Morality (hat tip: Ninth Level Ireland) updates Plagiarising ‘plagiarism’ [...]