cearta.ie

the Irish for rights

“The right of a free press to communicate information without let or restraint is intrinsic to a free and democratic society”

Luminarium, Dublin, 15 Jan 2007I have recently commented on this blog that the right to freedom of expression Article 40.6.1(i) has finally got some teeth!?. That process continued today in the Supreme Court, where Fennelly J uttered the line used as the title to this post.

RTE News reports:

Tribunal loses Supreme Court appeal

The Mahon Tribunal has failed in an attempt to ban publication by the media of material circulated by the tribunal in private in advance of public hearings with a direction that they should remain confidential.

The tribunal appealed the decision of the High Court not to grant a perpetual injunction preventing the Sunday Business Post and others from publishing such material.

But in a majority decision the Supreme Court dismissed the tribunal’s appeal. The court said the tribunal was seeking an order that would restrict freedom of expression. …

Ireland.com reports that:

… the National Newspapers of Ireland (NNI) which represents daily, Sunday and national weekly newspapers sold in Ireland, welcomed the decision as “a significant vindication of the role of the press.”

The judgments have been made available on the Courts Service website. The majority judgment (Fennelly J; Murray CJ and Denham J concurring) is here; the minority judgment is here. From the judgment of Fennelly J for the majority:

41. Freedom of expression is, of course, guaranteed both by the Constitution and by the [European] Convention [on Human Rights], but, even without those guarantees and simply on the basis of the common law, it is elementary that any party asking a court to impose prior restraint of publication must justify it.

42. … The courts do not pass judgment on whether any particular exercise of the right of freedom of expression is in the public interest. The media are not required to justify publication by reference to any public interest other than that of freedom of expression itself. They are free to publish material which is not in the public interest. I have no doubt that much of the material which appears in the news media serves no public interest whatever. I have equally no doubt that much of it is motivated, and perfectly permissibly so, by the pursuit of profit. Publication may indeed be prompted by less noble motives. So far as the facts of the present case are concerned, the decision of Mr O’Kelly to publish the names of three TD’s in direct defiance of the wishes of the Tribunal was disgraceful and served no identifiable public interest. On the other hand, that does not mean that it was unlawful.

43. The right of freedom of expression extends the same protection to worthless, prurient and meretricious publication as it does to worthy, serious and socially valuable works. The undoubted fact that news media frequently and implausibly invoke the public interest to cloak worthless and even offensive material does not affect the principle. …

51. Clearly, the Constitution, unequivocally guarantees both the right to express convictions and opinions and the right to communicate facts or information. These rights are inseparable. It matters little, at least for present purposes, which Article of the Constitution expresses the guarantee. The right of a free press to communicate information without let or restraint is intrinsic to a free and democratic society.

Much with which to conjure here, not least with my cry for help on this blog for my paper on disentangling the enumerated right to freedom of expression in Art 40.6.1(i) and the unenumerated right to communicate, to both of which Fennelly J referred in his judgment.

Related Tags: [ ]

7 Responses to ““The right of a free press to communicate information without let or restraint is intrinsic to a free and democratic society””

  1. […] IRTC [1999] 1 IR 12, and more recently in Mahon v Post Publications [2007] IESC 15 (29 March 2007) (already discussed on this blog). The second theme of my paper will be the effects of this latter case on […]

  2. […] and not to the jury of 12 which is actually selected from that panel. Moreover, even though speech protections under the Irish Constitution are finally getting some teeth, I doubt whether they are sharp enough […]

  3. […] the arguments about 40.3 and 40.6.1(i) already made, but they could also invoke the protections for freedom of the press in the latter article. As a consequence, RTÉ could easily have chosen to stand over their […]

  4. […] the media in that context. This would give rise to questions about whether freedom of expression is automatically a matter to be placed in the balance, or whether it is something that must be argued for. The […]

  5. […] the Convention. For example, in Mahon v Post Publications [2007] 3 IR 338, [2007] IESC 15 (29 March 2007), Fennelly J for the majority held 41. Freedom of expression is, of course, guaranteed both by the […]

  6. […] the Convention. For example, in Mahon v Post Publications [2007] 3 IR 338, [2007] IESC 15 (29 March 2007), Fennelly J for the majority held 41. Freedom of expression is, of course, guaranteed both by the […]

  7. […] here, here, here, here, here, here and here) with the free speech guarantees in the Constitution (here and here) and the ECHR. There is plainly a restriction upon political speech in both cases, so the […]

Leave a Reply

 

Welcome

Me in a hatHi there! Thanks for dropping by. I'm Eoin O'Dell, and this is my blog: Cearta.ie - the Irish for rights.

"Cearta" really is the Irish word for rights, so the title provides a good sense of the scope of this blog.

In general, I write here about private law, free speech, and cyber law; and, in particular, I write about Irish law and education policy.

Academic links
Academia.edu
ORCID

Subscribe

  • RSS Feed
  • RSS Feed
  • Subscribe via Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Archives by month

Categories by topic

My recent tweets

Blogroll (or, really, a non-blogroll)

What I'd like for here is a simple widget that takes the list of feeds from my existing RSS reader and displays it here as a blogroll. Nothing fancy. I'd love a recommendation, if you have one.

I had built a blogroll here on my Google Reader RSS subscriptions. Google Reader produced a line of html for each RSS subscription category, each of which I pasted here. So I had a list of my subscriptions as my blogroll, organised by category, which updated whenever I edited Google Reader. Easy peasy. However, with the sad and unnecessary demise of that product, so also went this blogroll. Please take a moment to mourn Google Reader. If there's an RSS reader which provides a line of html for the list of subscriptions, or for each RSS subscription category as Google Reader did, I'd happily use that. So, as I've already begged, I'd love a recommendation, if you have one.

Meanwhile, please bear with me until I find a new RSS+Blogroll solution

Thanks,

Eoin.

Licence

Creative Commons License

This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. I am happy for you to reuse and adapt my content, provided that you attribute it to me, and do not use it commercially. Thanks. Eoin

Credit where it’s due

The image in the banner above is a detail from a photograph of the front of Trinity College Dublin night taken by Melanie May.

Others whose technical advice and help have proven invaluable in keeping this show on the road include Dermot Frost, Karlin Lillington, Daithí Mac Síthigh, and Antoin Ó Lachtnáin.

Thanks to Blacknight for hosting.