the Irish for rights

Manifestos: Defamation, Privacy & Political funding

picture-1.pngAs I was having a look this evening at the various manifestos on the political parties’ websites, I wondered what each of them might have to say about the kinds of issues discussed on this blog.

Manifestos have yet to be published on the websites by Fine Gael, and Sinn Féin (who have a dedicated page on their election website for the manifesto, but it’s not there yet); and the Socialist Party seems to have avoided the use of the word manifesto for their election site.

Given that (as I have already noted here) the Defamation Bill, 2006 has fallen with the outgoing Dáil, let’s start with defamation reform. There’s nothing about it in the Fianna Fáil Manifesto Now, The Next Steps (pdf) (apart from a promise (p53) to enact a right of reply in the context of broadcasting reform), in the Green Party‘s Manifesto 2007. it’s time (pdf), or on the Socialist Party’s site. However, the Labour Party Manifesto, The Fair Society (pdf), says (p53):

We will enact a Defamation Bill to reform the law of libel and slander. We will review the necessity for a counterbalancing Privacy Bill when the defamation bill is enacted and when the effects of the Bill in practice have been fully examined.

And the Progressive Democrats‘ Manifesto, From Good to Great. Continuing Ireland’s Radical Transformation (pdf), says (p31):

Defamation – The Progressive Democrats will enact the Defamation Bill. The issue of privacy law reform will be revisited with a view to ensuring that injunctions cannot be used to muzzle the press on matters of genuine public concern.

These promises to enact “a” (Labour) or “the” (PDs) Defamation Bill are welcome, though there is no reason why it should not have happened already. Moreover, it seems that the issues of defamation and privacy continue to be yoked together. To be fair to the Labour Party, they are quite properly seeking to decouple them, and to callthe Privacy Bill in its current form into question. However, reflecting their conference promise (already noted on this blog [in a post that also referred to their café bar proposals, which are back, on p34 of the manifesto!]), the PDs are promsing merely to tinker at the edges of the Bill. More interesting still, though, is the fact that these are the only references to privacy in these manifestos: there is nothing at all in any of them about traffic (all the more reason, then, to take Antoin‘s advice, and ask the candidates on the doorsteps about it).

Finally, there are some interesting nuggets on political reform in general and political party finances in particular. Though the manifestos of Fianna Fáil and the PDs are largely silent on these issues, the Green Party’s proposals include (pp 30-31):

  • a reduction in the number of TDs and Ministers,
  • an increase in Dáil sitting time,
  • a change to the electoral system to include some TDs elected via a national party list rather than PR-STV,
  • a devolution of central power to the regions, and
  • “adequate state funding of political parties, based on electoral results and [a] ban corporate, institutional or foreign-based donations”.

while Labour will (pp 88-89):

  • reform Oireachtas sitting and procedures
  • improve freedom of information, and whistleblower protection, and (by referendum) reverse absolute Cabinet Confidentiality,
  • repeal the Official Secrets Act and replace it with far more limited offences subject to a public interest defence,
  • review the law on spending by political parties with a view to developing a more rigorous system; and
  • “Given that it is not constitutionally feasible to abolish outright donations to political organisations, we will introduce legislation to restrict contributions to political parties and candidates …”.

In both cases, classic opposition stuff. The Labour Party package here, if enacted, would go a long way towards improving the process political debate in particular and the system of freedom of expression in general in this country. But I’m intrigued by that last quote from the Labour Party manifesto. First, why is a funding ban not constitutionally feasible? The issue has never been directly tested by the Irish courts (though the Green Party’s proposals, if enacted, might provide the occasion); the issue is at best a matter of conjecture, even if the best conjecture is that a ban is not constitutionally feasible. Second, even so, the constitutional position could be altered by referendum – and if the party is prepared to propose one in the context of cabinet confidentiality, why not also here?

Related Tags: [ ]

2 Responses to “Manifestos: Defamation, Privacy & Political funding”

  1. […] defamation, privacy, and political funding, and I have set out the fruits of this musing over on Cearta. Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and […]

  2. Eoin says:

    The Fine Gael Manifesto has just been published (html summary | pdf). It seems to have nothing in it about defamation, privacy, data retention, or campaign funding (though there is a page (p10) of proposed reforms to Dáil procedures) – oh, and on their Broadcasting policy page (p6), they misspell ‘principle’ as ‘principal’ in the very first promise!

Leave a Reply



Me in a hatHi there! Thanks for dropping by. I’m Eoin O’Dell, and this is my blog: Cearta.ie – the Irish for rights.

“Cearta” really is the Irish word for rights, so the title provides a good sense of the scope of this blog.

In general, I write here about private law, free speech, and cyber law; and, in particular, I write about Irish law and education policy.

Academic links


  • RSS Feed
  • RSS Feed
  • Subscribe via Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Archives by month

Categories by topic

My recent tweets

Blogroll (or, really, a non-blogroll)

What I'd like for here is a simple widget that takes the list of feeds from my existing RSS reader and displays it here as a blogroll. Nothing fancy. I'd love a recommendation, if you have one.

I had built a blogroll here on my Google Reader RSS subscriptions. Google Reader produced a line of html for each RSS subscription category, each of which I pasted here. So I had a list of my subscriptions as my blogroll, organised by category, which updated whenever I edited Google Reader. Easy peasy. However, with the sad and unnecessary demise of that product, so also went this blogroll. Please take a moment to mourn Google Reader. If there's an RSS reader which provides a line of html for the list of subscriptions, or for each RSS subscription category as Google Reader did, I'd happily use that. So, as I've already begged, I'd love a recommendation, if you have one.

Meanwhile, please bear with me until I find a new RSS+Blogroll solution




Creative Commons License

This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. I am happy for you to reuse and adapt my content, provided that you attribute it to me, and do not use it commercially. Thanks. Eoin

Credit where it’s due

The image in the banner above is a detail from a photograph of the front of Trinity College Dublin night taken by Melanie May.

Others whose technical advice and help have proven invaluable in keeping this show on the road include Dermot Frost, Karlin Lillington, Daithí Mac Síthigh, and Antoin Ó Lachtnáin.

Thanks to Blacknight for hosting.