Why do we need a Censorship of Publications Board?

| 4 Comments
| Censorship, IFCO, prior restraint

Film Censor's Office former brass plate, via IFCO websiteFine Gael‘s new policy document “Reinventing Government” will no doubt keep a lot of political debates (and perhaps even fires) burning during the long cold November nights, and I look forward to the heat thereby generated. Quick off the mark was Ninth Level Ireland with a summary of its proposals on universities. Glancing through it, I was also taken by two aspects of its list of “Quangos to be abolished” in Appendix 1, one inclusion and one omission. The inclusion is this:

Department of Justice and Law Reform

… Merge Censorship of Publications Board and Office of Film Censor and Irish Film Classification Office into single Censorship Office.

Merge Censorship of Publications Appeals Board and Censorship of Films Appeal Board into single Censorship Appeals Office. …

I can understand why a classification system for movies and computer games is felt to be necessary, but I am at a loss to understand the need for prior restraint upon print publications, and I would therefore achieve the desired savings simply by abolishing the Censorship of Publications Board and Censorship of Publications Appeals Board altogether. …

Read More »

Gallimaufry

| 2 Comments
| Blasphemy, Broadcasting Authority of Ireland, Censorship, ECHR, Gallimaufry, Phones in class, Typography

GallimaufryDr Johnson defined gallimaufry as

1. A hoch-poch …
2. Any inconsistent or ridiculous medley. …

Here’s another hoch-poch, or hotch-potch (though, of course, not a hotchpot) of links relevant to the themes of this blog that have caught my eye over the last while. I’ll begin and end with some stories of censorship, and along the way I’ll mention open wifi, international perceptions of Ireland, typography, mobile phones, broadcasting, and the future of our universities.

First, as a supplement to my post on the Lady Chatterley’s Lover trials, Alan Travis in the Guardian argues that the failure of the Chatterley prosecution secured the liberty of literature in Britain over the past 50 years. By way of a similar supplement to my post on the decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Akdas v Turkey 41056/04 (15 February 2010) that a Turkish ban on Apollinaire’s Les Onze Mille Verges infringed Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, the Guardian reports that Turkey is at it again: publisher Irfan Sanci is being prosecuted – under the same Turkish provisions that were found wanting in Akdas – for publishing a translation of another Apollinaire noverl, Les exploits d’un jeune Don Juan (The Exploits of a Young Don Juan).…

Read More »

The first reserved judgment on the Defamation Act, 2009

| 3 Comments
| Defamation, Defamation Act 2009

Four Courts dome, via the Courts.ie websiteSection 28(1) of the Defamation Act, 2009 (also here) provides:

A person who claims to be the subject of a statement that he or she alleges is defamatory may apply to the Circuit Court for an order (in this Act referred to as a “declaratory order”) that the statement is false and defamatory of him or her.

Today, in an important decision, (that has been overshadowed by the coverage given to Doherty v Government of Ireland [2010] IEHC 369 (03 November 2010)), the first reserved judgment on the 2009 Act has been handed down on an application pursuant to this section (and another action seeking a declaration is pending):

Porn offender still capable of having character defamed, judge rules

A convicted porn user who had openly admitted his guilt and had sought psychiatric help is still capable of having his “residual” character defamed, a judge decided today.

Judge Joseph Matthews said that 34-year-old Barry Watters, of Hazelwood Avenue, Dundalk, Co Louth, had suffered a substantial loss of reputation through his guilt, conviction and imprisonment on pornographic charges. But he could not reasonably be said to be in the same category as a convicted prisoner who refused to accept his guilt, remained in denial and do absolutely nothing with no remorse, contrition, acceptance of wrong doing or show any intention to rehabilitate or not re-offend.

…

Read More »

What are the University of Dublin and the NUI actually for? And what should they do?

| 1 Comment
| Universities

Dublin University logo, via WikipediaThe first item in the Trinity College Dublin (TCD) news feed at present is the report that Professor Petros Florides was recently inaugurated as a Pro-Chancellor of the University of Dublin. This reminds me that I often hear the question: “what is the University of Dublin for?”. And in the context of NUI Galway, NUI Maynooth, UCC, UCD et al, I often hear the similar question: “what is the NUI for?” Answers to these questions usually focus on history. The Charter of 1592 which founded TCD established it as “mother of a university”; whilst the Irish Universities Act, 1908 consolidated many of the existing Irish universities and colleges into the National University of Ireland. However, these answers only tell us where the University of Dublin and the NUI came from. They don’t tell us what these institutions are for. Other answers focus on degree-awarding powers, commencements, graduations, university governance, elections, connections with alumni, and ancillary academic services, before trailing off into a slightly embarrassed silence. These answers certainly get closer to telling us what these institutions are for, but they don’t really offer a strong justification for their continuing existence or future relevance. I’m actually a fan of both; and I think that the University of Dublin is symbiotically integral to Trinity College Dublin.…

Read More »

Harmonising Private Law

| 1 Comment
| Conferences, Lectures, Papers and Workshops, Contract

Stefan Vogenauer, via Oxford University websiteProfessor Stefan Vogenauer (University of Oxford) (pictured left) will give the winter lecture for the Irish Society of Comparative Law (ISCL) at 5:00pm on Thursday, 11 November 2010, in the Swift Lecture Theatre, Room 2041A Arts Block, Trinity College Dublin (map here). His title is:

The Theory and Practice of Using Comparative Law in the Harmonisation of Private Law: the Case of Release of Contractual Rights.

Professor Vogenauer is Professor of Comparative Law at the University of Oxford, a Fellow of Brasenose College Oxford, and Director of the Oxford Institute of European and Comparative Law (IECL). His research interests lie mainly in the areas of comparative law, private law, international uniform law, European legal history and legal method. For his comparative and historical analysis of the interpretation of statutes in English, French, German and EU law, Die Auslegung von Gesetzen in England und auf dem Kontinent (Verlag Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2001, 2 vols), he was awarded the Max Weber Prize of the Bavarian Academy of Sciences and Humanities and the Otto Hahn Medal of the Max Planck Society in 2002, as well as the 2008 Prize of the German Legal History Conference. More recently, the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) awarded him approximately £350,000 to for a research project on ‘The Common Frame of Reference on European Contract Law in the Context of English and German Law’, which will explore the relationship between the recently published Common Frame of Reference and the contract laws of EU member states, as exemplified by German and English law.…

Read More »

Grading and marking, updates

| 4 Comments
| Andrew Croskery, Grading and Marking, Litigation, Restitution, Universities

Graded Paper, viaFirst, to my posts on grading and marking, I must add a wonderful post by not that kind of doctor applying the Elisabeth Kübler-Ross model of five stages of grief – denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance – to the process of grading papers! Wonderful (h/t efdel).

Second, in another grading and marking story, this time by way of comparison with my posts on Andrew Croskery‘s case against QUB, consider the case of a student who sued the University of Pennsylvania for awarding him a degree from their engineering college rather than Wharton School of Business: his misrepresentation and unjust enrichment claims failed.

Third, in one of my posts on the Croskery litigation, I analysed a similar recent case in the Ontario Court of Appeal: Jaffer v York University 2010 ONCA 654 (7 October 2010). There’s an interesting post on the case on the Canadian blog, The Court, This Student Isn’t Just a Number:

(1) Universities: Now, Not-So-Independent Centres of Learning
Perhaps the most interesting and relevant aspect of this case concerns the Court’s finding that academic disputes grounded in contract or tort can be heard by the Superior Court of Justice in Ontario.

…

Read More »

© cearta.ie 2025. Powered by WordPress