the Irish for rights

Justice shall be administered in public

The Four Courts, by Darragh Sherwin, via FlickrArticle 34.1 of the Constitution provides that

Justice shall be administered in courts established by law by judges appointed in the manner provided by this Constitution, and, save in such special and limited cases as may be prescribed by law, shall be administered in public.

Giving judgment in the Supreme Court yesterday in a very sad case, Hardiman J began by saying:

On the hearing of this appeal the Court was requested on both sides of the case to take such steps as were possible to prevent the publication of the applicant’s name or at of any detail which might identify him. This was requested on the basis that he was, undisputedly, a person under a disability.

The Court did not consider that it had, in these proceedings, any power to make an order in that regard. However the Court agreed to, and did, request any representatives of the media who might be present not to publish his name and said that it would not itself do so. The Court now repeats this request to any person who may wish to report this case either for the ordinary media or for the purposes of law reporting.

The title of the case online (MD v Clinical Director of St Brendan’s Hospital [2007] IESC 37 (27 July 2007)) certainly doesn’t identify the unsuccessful applicant; so, to that extent, Hardiman J’s entreaty was heeded. But, as Eddie McGarr has recently had occasion to observe, the main principle in Article 34.1 is that of public justice. If there is no express legal basis for ordering a case to be held in camera or for the identity of a party to be concealed, then as Hardiman J observed here, the Court has no power of its own motion to exclude the public or the press (Irish Times Ltd v Ireland [1998] 1 IR 359 (SC)), or to allow a party to a case to remain anonymous (Roe v Blood Transfusion Board [1996] 3 IR 67 (HC)).

Nevertheless, persons in the position of the applicant in this case plainly have privacy interests worth protecting. I hope that those reporting the case act responsibly in respecting his privacy, but I wonder whether the legislature might give some thought to amending the Mental Health Act, 2001 (also here) to include a power similar to that in section 45 of the Courts (Supplemental Provisions) Act, 1961 (also here).

This is not a call for the immediate introduction of the power. Rather, it is a call to consider the matter and in particular to consider the strength of the general principle of open justice in this context – after all, the leading cases take the view that those who seek to invoke the courts must do so subject to the fact that the public has an interest in ensuring that justice is not only done but also is seen to be done. Those who litigate must accept that the litigation will very likely be held in public. Justice may be blind, but the public are not, and they should not lightly have blindness thrust upon them. Nevertheless, there are certain things from which members of the public should – for reasons of prudence or sensitivity – avert their gaze, and the identity of those in MD’s situation may very well be one of them.

Update (27 July 2007): I learn from Darius Whelan that, pursuant to section 75 of the Mental Health Act, 2001, the Department of Health and Children published a review of the Act in May 2007. So far as I can see, the only recommendation relating to cases in the High Court under the Act is this:

49. It would be helpful for the Mental Health Commission to publish relevant judgments relating to the Act on its website and issue advice to service providers as required. (Section 73)

But there is still time for the issue raised here to be considered, as the report recommends that a more detailed review of the Act should be undertaken by the Department within 5 years of the full implementation of the Act, that is, before 1 November 2011.

9 Responses to “Justice shall be administered in public”

  1. Darius says:

    S.27 of the Civil Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2008 now provides that where in any civil proceedings a relevant person (a party or witness) has a medical condition, an application may be made to the court by any party for an order prohibiting the publication or broadcast of any matter relating to the proceedings which would, or would be likely to, identify the relevant person as a person having that condition. The court shall grant the order under this section only if it is satisfied that the relevant person has a medical condition, his or her identification as a person with that condition would be likely to cause undue stress to him or her, and the order would not be prejudicial to the interests of justice.

    This section appears to be modelled on s.181 of the Criminal Justice Act 2006, which allows anonymity for witnesses in criminal cases who have a medical condition.

  2. Eoin says:

    Thanks for the update, Darius. It’s good news.

  3. […] A free speech justification founded in the rule of law might find its home in the Article 34.1 commitment to open justice and the Article 40.6.1 reference to the rightful liberty of expression of the organs of public […]

  4. […] In Independent Newspapers v Anderson [2006] 3 IR 341, [2006] IEHC 62 (15 February 2006), applying Murphy, Clarke J quashed an order made by the District Justice precluding the publication of the name of the accused. Courts might request discretion in the reporting of a case, but – without statutory authority – they cannot require it (MD v Clinical Director of St Brendan’s Hospital [2008] 1 IR 632, [2007] IESC 37 (27 July 2007) (Hardiman J), blogged here). […]

  5. […] As I have commented before on this blog, Justice may be blind, but the public are not, and they should not lightly have blindness thrust upon them. […]

  6. […] dealt with in this Bill relates to open justice and the in camera rule. As I have had occasion to point out in previous posts on this blog, Article 34.1 of the Constitution requires that, “save in such […]

  7. […] 34.1 of the Constitution provides that “Justice … shall be administered in public“. By way of footnote to my earlier post on Open justice and access to court documents comes […]

  8. […] 34.1 of the Constitution provides that “Justice … shall be administered in public“. By way of footnote to my earlier post on Open justice and access to court documents comes […]

  9. […] “expect, and enjoy”. She pointed out that Article 34.1 of the Constitution requires that justice be administered in public. And she argued that reporters should not have to fear that a “simple oversight, omission or […]

Leave a Reply



Me in a hatHi there! Thanks for dropping by. I’m Eoin O’Dell, and this is my blog: Cearta.ie – the Irish for rights.

“Cearta” really is the Irish word for rights, so the title provides a good sense of the scope of this blog.

In general, I write here about private law, free speech, and cyber law; and, in particular, I write about Irish law and education policy.

Academic links


  • RSS Feed
  • RSS Feed
  • Subscribe via Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Archives by month

Categories by topic

My recent tweets

Blogroll (or, really, a non-blogroll)

What I'd like for here is a simple widget that takes the list of feeds from my existing RSS reader and displays it here as a blogroll. Nothing fancy. I'd love a recommendation, if you have one.

I had built a blogroll here on my Google Reader RSS subscriptions. Google Reader produced a line of html for each RSS subscription category, each of which I pasted here. So I had a list of my subscriptions as my blogroll, organised by category, which updated whenever I edited Google Reader. Easy peasy. However, with the sad and unnecessary demise of that product, so also went this blogroll. Please take a moment to mourn Google Reader. If there's an RSS reader which provides a line of html for the list of subscriptions, or for each RSS subscription category as Google Reader did, I'd happily use that. So, as I've already begged, I'd love a recommendation, if you have one.

Meanwhile, please bear with me until I find a new RSS+Blogroll solution




Creative Commons License

This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. I am happy for you to reuse and adapt my content, provided that you attribute it to me, and do not use it commercially. Thanks. Eoin

Credit where it’s due

The image in the banner above is a detail from a photograph of the front of Trinity College Dublin night taken by Melanie May.

Others whose technical advice and help have proven invaluable in keeping this show on the road include Dermot Frost, Karlin Lillington, Daithí Mac Síthigh, and Antoin Ó Lachtnáin.

Thanks to Blacknight for hosting.