the Irish for rights

Don’t mention the hotel

Image of Basil Fawlty, from an episode of Fawlty Towers, via the BBC websiteLegal Eagle on SkepticLawyer writes:

Fawlty Towers fights back

My parents just came back from a holiday in Europe, and were telling me about one of the less salubrious hotel rooms they experienced. … [They] were contemplating writing a review for a travel website to warn other travellers that this purportedly “four star” hotel was not all it was cracked up to be.

Still, it seems that, as this piece suggests, it’s worth thinking hard before you write a review which is critical:

Travellers who post scathing reviews or comments about hotels or restaurants could be exposing themselves to long and costly legal battles …

You think this is far-fetched? Well, read my post about what happened when Sydney restaurant Coco Roco got an unfavourable review… A majority of the High Court found that the review was defamatory (and overturned the conclusion of the jury on that point).

I think this is a dangerous precedent. If you serve up food which is not to a reviewer’s taste, or your hotel was not to your guest’s liking, what you need to do is listen to the criticism, and see if there is any merit in it.

I think Legal Eagle is vastly overstating the problem here. First, in the High Court case to which she refers (John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Gacic (2007) 230 CLR 291, [2007] HCA 28 (14 June 2007)), the Court held that the review could in principle bear a defamatory meaning, but the case turned on a matter of procedure by which the proceedings were being conducted ahead of any consideration of the newspaper’s defences. In such cases, even if reviews are in principle capable of being defamatory, they will almost always attract the benefit of the defence of fair comment. In Ireland, section 20(1) of the Defamation Act, 2009 has rebadged fair comment as honest opinion and defined it as follows:

It shall be a defence (to be known, and in this section referred to, as the “defence of honest opinion”) to a defamation action for the defendant to prove that, in the case of a statement consisting of an opinion, the opinion was honestly held.

So, if you honestly hold your opinion that the hotel was terrible, then you will be able to establish the defence. Just don’t mention the war.

4 Responses to “Don’t mention the hotel”

  1. Legal Eagle says:

    The question is whether there will be a chilling effect in the first place – because people won’t want to risk attracting legal action unless they’re backed by someone well-resourced (like a newspaper company). They might have a defence, for sure – but who wants to get entangled in a dispute in the first place?

  2. […] interest. Again, section 20(1) provides for a defence of honest opinion, renaming and replacing the defence of fair comment. The plea in Hunter v Duckworth [2003] IEHC 81 (31 July 2003), dodged by the […]

  3. […] Act, 2009 (also here). It is better to see the refreshingly open approach to the defence of fair comment at common […]

  4. […] Law Blog | Techdirt ). (Indeed, review authors will usually be able to rely on the defence of fair comment – or honest opinion – anyway). More recently still, Lilian Edwards has blogged about […]

Leave a Reply



Me in a hatHi there! Thanks for dropping by. I’m Eoin O’Dell, and this is my blog: Cearta.ie – the Irish for rights.

“Cearta” really is the Irish word for rights, so the title provides a good sense of the scope of this blog.

In general, I write here about private law, free speech, and cyber law; and, in particular, I write about Irish law and education policy.

Academic links


  • RSS Feed
  • RSS Feed
  • Subscribe via Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Archives by month

Categories by topic

My recent tweets

Blogroll (or, really, a non-blogroll)

What I'd like for here is a simple widget that takes the list of feeds from my existing RSS reader and displays it here as a blogroll. Nothing fancy. I'd love a recommendation, if you have one.

I had built a blogroll here on my Google Reader RSS subscriptions. Google Reader produced a line of html for each RSS subscription category, each of which I pasted here. So I had a list of my subscriptions as my blogroll, organised by category, which updated whenever I edited Google Reader. Easy peasy. However, with the sad and unnecessary demise of that product, so also went this blogroll. Please take a moment to mourn Google Reader. If there's an RSS reader which provides a line of html for the list of subscriptions, or for each RSS subscription category as Google Reader did, I'd happily use that. So, as I've already begged, I'd love a recommendation, if you have one.

Meanwhile, please bear with me until I find a new RSS+Blogroll solution




Creative Commons License

This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. I am happy for you to reuse and adapt my content, provided that you attribute it to me, and do not use it commercially. Thanks. Eoin

Credit where it’s due

The image in the banner above is a detail from a photograph of the front of Trinity College Dublin night taken by Melanie May.

Others whose technical advice and help have proven invaluable in keeping this show on the road include Dermot Frost, Karlin Lillington, Daithí Mac Síthigh, and Antoin Ó Lachtnáin.

Thanks to Blacknight for hosting.