the Irish for rights

Who will google Google?

magnifying-glass-76520_960_720The Roman poet Juvenal asked Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (who will watch the watchers?). In a similar vein, one of Elvis Costello‘s more acidic songs of loss is ‘Watching the Detectives’ (lyrics | lyrics with images | YouTube). If is the search engine which does (most of) our detecting for us, one of the animating questions of the moment is who is watching the Google detective on our behalf? One answer is provided by Article 29 of Directive 95/46/EC (also here) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data

This is the EU Data Protection Directive, and it is a major plank in the data protection strand of the EU’s information society policy. It has been implemented in Ireland by the Data Protection (Amendment) Act, 2003 (also here) amending the Data Protection Act, 1988 (also here)). Article 29 of the Directive provides for the establishment of a Working Party on the Protection of Individuals with regard to the Processing of Personal Data. That’s a bit of a mouthful, so it’s usually simply called either the Article 29 Data Protection Working Party or even the Article 29 Working Party. It is composed of a representative from each of the EU member states’ data protection authorities (the Irish member is the the Data Protection Commissioner), and of various EU representatives. It is one of many such official and quasi-official data privacy watchdogs; the International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners (ICDPPC) had already founded the International Working Group on Data Protection in Telecommunications (IWGDPT) in 1983. This all might seem more than a bit arcane, except that the Article 29 Working Group is in the news this weekend, as the detective watching Google.

According to the BBC, arising out of the privacy policy Google announced in March (Google | BBC):

Google has been told that it may be breaking European privacy laws by keeping people’s search information on its servers for up to two years. … The Article 29 group … has asked Google to clarify its policy.

In particular, according to c|netNews.com:

The issue surrounds Google’s policy of anonymizing its server logs after 18 to 24 months. According to a Commission source, the advisory group is concerned with how the information is managed, rather than the length of time it is stored.

More to the point, SilconValley.com are reporting that the Article 29 Working Group have the support of EU Justice Commissioner Franco Frattini:

EU spokesman Pietro Petrucci said Friday that … Commissioner … Frattini … “considers those questions raised by the letter to be appropriate and legitimate,” …

Unsurprisingly, Google have come out fighting. According to CNN and Yahoo!News,

Google will tell European regulators that it needs to hold on to users’ search data for up to two years for security and commercial reasons … The world’s top Internet search engine said Friday it would respond by June 19 to a letter from a European Union data protection advisory group expressing concern it was keeping information on users’ searches for too long.

“The concern of EU law is that a company that collects data on its customers should keep it as long as it is necessary, but not longer,” Peter Fleischer, Google’s global privacy counsel, told Reuters in a telephone interview.

This is an important development in the protection of our online privacy. And, in principle – as the image (above left) from John Battelle’s blog conveys – it applies not just to Google but all the other search engines as well. Watch Google. Watch the search engines. As John Battelle says of this: watch this space.

(Disclosure: many of the links in this post were found using Google’s search engine!)

Update (5 June 2006): Data Protection Thinker has an informative post and some extremely well-chosen links for further reading on this issue, including the text (pdf) of the letter from the Article 29 Working Party to Google.

Related Tags: [ ]

10 Responses to “Who will google Google?”

  1. […] Who will google Google? By Eoin If Google is the search engine which does (most of) our detecting for us, one of the animating questions of the moment is who is watching the Google detective on our behalf? One answer is provided by Article 29 of Directive 95/46/EC … cearta.ie – http://www.cearta.ie […]

  2. […] New York Times (13 June 2007; sub req’d) is so important, and so perfectly reflects my views, that it’s worth reproducing in full (in fact, I wish I’d written it). The headline is […]

  3. […] on from my posts Who will google Google?, That was the week that was, and Watching your every move, come two articles from John Collins in […]

  4. […] Protection Working Party released an opinion (Opinion 1/2008, WP 148: pdf; background on this blog here and here) concerning the applicability of the Data Protection Directive (95/46/EC) and the Data […]

  5. […] have had occasion to comment on this blog that the Roman poet Juvenal asked Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (who will watch the watchers?). […]

  6. […] actors such as Google and Amazon should retain so much personal data as to raise significant privacy concerns. More recently, the range of worry has broadened, with the realisation that such companies […]

  7. […] for the terrible post title, my further apologies to […]

  8. […] following on from my post about the Article 29 Working Party’s concerns about Google’s privacy policies, comes […]

  9. […] do with our private data. Both reports cover both issues. First, the Article 29 Working Party (the co-ordinating group of EU data protection commissioners) have published an opinion addressing the key data protection […]

  10. […] Responsibility (Cambridge UP, 2015; summary), which I have discussed on this blog in the past (here | here | here | here | here). Laidlaw argues that these digital developments need a new system of […]

Leave a Reply



Me in a hatHi there! Thanks for dropping by. I’m Eoin O’Dell, and this is my blog: Cearta.ie – the Irish for rights.

“Cearta” really is the Irish word for rights, so the title provides a good sense of the scope of this blog.

In general, I write here about private law, free speech, and cyber law; and, in particular, I write about Irish law and education policy.

Academic links


  • RSS Feed
  • RSS Feed
  • Subscribe via Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Archives by month

Categories by topic

My recent tweets

Blogroll (or, really, a non-blogroll)

What I'd like for here is a simple widget that takes the list of feeds from my existing RSS reader and displays it here as a blogroll. Nothing fancy. I'd love a recommendation, if you have one.

I had built a blogroll here on my Google Reader RSS subscriptions. Google Reader produced a line of html for each RSS subscription category, each of which I pasted here. So I had a list of my subscriptions as my blogroll, organised by category, which updated whenever I edited Google Reader. Easy peasy. However, with the sad and unnecessary demise of that product, so also went this blogroll. Please take a moment to mourn Google Reader. If there's an RSS reader which provides a line of html for the list of subscriptions, or for each RSS subscription category as Google Reader did, I'd happily use that. So, as I've already begged, I'd love a recommendation, if you have one.

Meanwhile, please bear with me until I find a new RSS+Blogroll solution




Creative Commons License

This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. I am happy for you to reuse and adapt my content, provided that you attribute it to me, and do not use it commercially. Thanks. Eoin

Credit where it’s due

The image in the banner above is a detail from a photograph of the front of Trinity College Dublin night taken by Melanie May.

Others whose technical advice and help have proven invaluable in keeping this show on the road include Dermot Frost, Karlin Lillington, Daithí Mac Síthigh, and Antoin Ó Lachtnáin.

Thanks to Blacknight for hosting.